Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:35:15 +0100):
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:20:59 +0200
Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sat, 11 Aug 2007
22:58:58 +0100):
Actually having dependencies package version mismatches
Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Mon, 13 Aug 2007
12:38:37 +0100):
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:14:46 +0200
Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Sun, 12 Aug 2007
18:18:10 +0100):
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:20:59 +0200
Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:20:59 +0200
Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sat, 11 Aug 2007
22:58:58 +0100):
Actually having dependencies package version mismatches needn't
cause any significant problems.
It does cause problems. You
Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Sun, 12 Aug 2007
18:18:10 +0100):
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:20:59 +0200
Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:58:58
+0100):
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:33:22 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:14:46 +0200
Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Sun, 12 Aug 2007
18:18:10 +0100):
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:20:59 +0200
Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sat, 11 Aug 2007
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 02:07:17PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Jeremy Chadwick, and lo! it spake thus:
I'm aware it manages all of the regular /var/db/pkg files just
like the pkg_* tools do. It has to for it to play nice. But it
also maintains a separate database for (I think) versioning and
Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:58:58 +0100):
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:33:22 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 03:02:53PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
5. pkg_delete port
I see. In step 5, pkg_delete port wont work if port is
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:20:59 +0200
Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:58:58
+0100):
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:33:22 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 03:02:53PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan
Hi,
Just a question that struck me today. Before there were the portupgrade
and other tools for upgrading installed applications to their newer
versions, how did things work out?
Did one upgrade applications through a series of make deinstall
reinstall commands (I wonder if these commands
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Just a question that struck me today. Before there were the portupgrade and
other tools for upgrading installed applications to their newer versions,
how did things work out?
Did one upgrade applications through a series of
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Hi,
Just a question that struck me today. Before there were the portupgrade
and other tools for upgrading installed applications to their newer
versions, how did things work out?
Did one upgrade
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 01:33:57AM -0700 I heard the voice of
Jeremy Chadwick, and lo! it spake thus:
I'm one of those administrators who does not want something like
portupgrade on his systems; I do not believe in having two separate
databases maintaining dependencies and what's installed
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Along those lines, yes. I'm one of those administrators who does not
want something like portupgrade on his systems; I do not believe in
having two separate databases maintaining dependencies and what's
installed (portupgrade vs. base system pkg_* tools). Lots of
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:37:22AM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Hi,
Just a question that struck me today. Before there were the portupgrade
and other tools for upgrading installed applications to
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:37:22AM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Hi,
Just a question that struck me today. Before there were the portupgrade
and other tools for upgrading installed
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:01:27PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:37:22AM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Hi,
Just a question that struck me today.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Did one upgrade applications through a series of make deinstall reinstall
commands (I wonder if these commands take care of dependencies too) or was
there any other way?
I used pkg_version -c, which has now been removed. It
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I'm curious now -- how does portupgrade (that's the tool I know/ use so
I'll use that as an example) do its upgrading? I have seen that in case of
an upgrade in builds the newer version, uninstalls the previous one (even
though it might be required by other apps), and then
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 10:51:41AM -0700, David Ericson Thiel wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:03:33PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Did one upgrade applications through a series of make deinstall reinstall
commands (I wonder if these commands take care of dependencies too) or was
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 03:02:53PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
5. pkg_delete port
I see. In step 5, pkg_delete port wont work if port is required by others
right? So you delete those apps too? Could be a lot of stuff to uninstall,
right?
Absolutely correct. That might seem like a
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:42:30AM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
portupgrade manages all the regular /var/db/pkg/*/* files just like
any other tool. It's got its db files, sure, but they're caches, not
alternate masters. I've never seen a sync mismatch (or rather, I
see them all the time,
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:33:22 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 03:02:53PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
5. pkg_delete port
I see. In step 5, pkg_delete port wont work if port is required
by others right? So you delete those apps too? Could be a
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 03:02:53PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
5. pkg_delete port
I see. In step 5, pkg_delete port wont work if port is required by others
right? So you delete those apps too? Could be a lot of stuff to uninstall,
right?
Absolutely correct.
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Afaik portmaster's beauty is that it doesn't have any dependencies like
portuprade does. Doesn't require ruby etc, so upgrades to them don't cause
problems like they could with portupgrade. (Again, haven't used portmaster,
so I don't know; this
24 matches
Mail list logo
