I'm trying to maintain the gnat-gcc* Ada compiler ports,
currently there are gnat-gcc34 and 41. I'd like to
introduce newer versions, and retire experimental 34,
which is built from an ancient binary which requires
FreeBSD 4 compatibility. I'd like to know:
1. what do I have to do that gnat-gcc
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:12:04PM +0100, Karel Miklav wrote:
I'm trying to maintain the gnat-gcc* Ada compiler ports,
currently there are gnat-gcc34 and 41. I'd like to
introduce newer versions, and retire experimental 34,
which is built from an ancient binary which requires
FreeBSD 4
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Karel Miklav wrote:
I'm trying to maintain the gnat-gcc* Ada compiler ports,
currently there are gnat-gcc34 and 41. I'd like to
introduce newer versions, and retire experimental 34,
which is built from an ancient binary which requires
FreeBSD 4 compatibility. I'd like to
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:12:04PM +0100, Karel Miklav wrote:
1. what do I have to do that gnat-gcc packages will
appear on FreeBSD FTP sites?
Get a buildable package committed to the FreeBSD ports tree.
Ups, sorry, they _are_ on the main site. They're just not
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 12:14:43AM +0100, Karel Miklav wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:12:04PM +0100, Karel Miklav wrote:
1. what do I have to do that gnat-gcc packages will
appear on FreeBSD FTP sites?
Get a buildable package committed to the FreeBSD ports tree.
Le Sam 9 déc 06 à 0:14:43 +0100, Karel Miklav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrivait :
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:12:04PM +0100, Karel Miklav wrote:
1. what do I have to do that gnat-gcc packages will
appear on FreeBSD FTP sites?
Get a buildable package committed to the
Thank you Daniel. Now when I see that the gnat-gcc
packages actually are on the FTP servers, there's no need
to panic. Those who are not comfortable with backwards
compatibility stuff installed as a result of building
from ports can just install the package. There's not
really much to improve,
