On 2007-Oct-06 21:20:24 +0300, Diomidis Spinellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can give you quantitative data on the benefits of shared objects. On a
web server running FreeBSD 6.2 I found 98 shared objects sharing 16,790,901
bytes of memory through 1,002 mappings.
Without shared libraries the
* Jeremy Messenger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
How do you deal with the security? It will be required for all ports that
depend on a port to be rebuild, so bump the PORTREVISION will be need. But
what about for non-static that don't need to be bump? A solution for that
might be need too.
Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
Implementation seem pretty straightfoward to me:
- Introduce STATIC_BUILD variable that changes usual build behavior
-
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:03:04PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
What I'd like to see first is some quantitative research on the
benefits of
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:03:04PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
What I'd like to see first is some quantitative
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 09:20:24PM +0300, Diomidis Spinellis wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:03:04PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
Implementation seem pretty straightfoward to me:
- Introduce
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
Implementation seem pretty straightfoward
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 03:05:36PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which
Gary Kline wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 03:05:36PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 06:18:08PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Gary Kline wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 03:05:36PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I just have an
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
Implementation seem pretty straightfoward to me:
- Introduce STATIC_BUILD variable that changes usual build behavior
- Process LIB_DEPENDS in a
12 matches
Mail list logo
