Hello, Dmitry.
You wrote 24 сентября 2011 г., 3:36:14:
The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
This commit breaks building `databases/sqlite3' with ICU support:
command line
Hello, Dmitry.
You wrote 24 сентября 2011 г., 3:36:14:
The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
devel/dbus could not be built with this commit, too:
checking for pkg-config...
Hello, Dmitry.
You wrote 24 сентября 2011 г., 3:36:14:
The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
Add devel/dbus-glib to the list...
Should I make formal PR for all these ports?
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 02:41:36PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Dmitry.
You wrote 24 2011 ??., 3:36:14:
The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
Hello, Erik.
You wrote 25 сентября 2011 г., 14:49:19:
The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
Add devel/dbus-glib to the list...
Should I make formal PR for all these
Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org writes:
Hello, Dmitry.
You wrote 24 сентября 2011 г., 3:36:14:
The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
devel/dbus could not be built with
* Lev Serebryakov (l...@freebsd.org) wrote:
The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
Add devel/dbus-glib to the list...
Should I make formal PR for all these ports?
All
Hello, h.
You wrote 25 сентября 2011 г., 18:40:06:
I see this, too. Turns out my cvsup mirror is broken. It doesn't have
LDFLAGS commit r1.696 for ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v while it has r1.86 for
ports/devel/dbus/Makefile,v. After using different mirror the issue is
gone away.
Yep, it looks
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 03:36:14AM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
Thanks you very much
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
--
Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amd...@amdmi3.ru
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
The patch is ready:
http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/ldflags.patch
While it's mostly a bunch of similar changes, I'd like community
eyes on specific important parts, namely Mk/ changes, python and
ruby and generally all := assigns of *FLAGS, as
Hi!
As CPPFLAGS support was recently added to ports ([1]) I've proposed to
add support for LDFLAGS as well ([2]). That is quite logical in terms of
consistence, and also may be useful for other purposes such as passing
LTO flags to the linker.
Since many ports set LDFLAGS via CONFIGURE_ENV, e.g.
12 matches
Mail list logo
