how -jX - [WAS Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE+= shells/bash, textproc/ispell

2009-05-07 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Johan Hendriks wrote: Sorry to hijack! But how can you set the ports build to use -j2 FORCE_MAKE_JOBS=yes|no ## defaults off MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=X ## defaults to number of cores MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes ## default no MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes ## default no See Mk/bsd.port.mk for more information. -- -

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE+= shells/bash, textproc/ispell

2009-05-07 Thread Wesley Shields
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 03:32:43PM +0200, Johan Hendriks wrote: > > >David O'Brien wrote: > >> I was under the impression that MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE was the default and one > >> had to explicity put MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes in a port. > >By default, it is neither SAFE or UNSAFE. By default, its always witho

RE: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE+= shells/bash, textproc/ispell

2009-05-07 Thread Johan Hendriks
>David O'Brien wrote: >> I was under the impression that MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE was the default and one >> had to explicity put MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes in a port. >By default, it is neither SAFE or UNSAFE. By default, its always without the >-j argument. Sorry to hijack! But how can you set the ports buil

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE+= shells/bash, textproc/ispell

2009-05-06 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
David O'Brien wrote: I was under the impression that MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE was the default and one had to explicity put MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes in a port. By default, it is neither SAFE or UNSAFE. By default, its always without the -j argument. --

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE+= shells/bash, textproc/ispell

2009-05-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:06:45PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: >> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:08:28PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >>> shells/bash is only failing about 2.5/8 >>> textproc/ispell is only about 2/8 >> Hi Philip, >> I'm sorry - I really don't know wh

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE+= shells/bash, textproc/ispell

2009-05-04 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:08:28PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: shells/bash is only failing about 2.5/8 textproc/ispell is only about 2/8 Hi Philip, I'm sorry - I really don't know what this means. The recent parrallel make functionality pav@ added to MK/bsd.por

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE+= shells/bash, textproc/ispell

2009-05-03 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:08:28PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > shells/bash is only failing about 2.5/8 > textproc/ispell is only about 2/8 Hi Philip, I'm sorry - I really don't know what this means. -- -- David (obr...@freebsd.org) ___ free

MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE+= shells/bash, textproc/ispell

2009-05-01 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
shells/bash is only failing about 2.5/8 textproc/ispell is only about 2/8 http://tb.riderway.com/index.php?action=describe_port&id=1856 http://tb.riderway.com/index.php?action=describe_port&id=1612 -- Philip M. Gollucc