anyway i don't understand people letting everything less or more simple to
be done "in cloud" which sooner or later ALWAYS means collected in hands
or some large corpo.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Roger Marquis wrote:
Anonymous (Carmel NY) wrote:
of course microsoft bought it to steal software more
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:13:35 -0700 (PDT) "Roger Marquis"
said
Anonymous (Carmel NY) wrote:
>> of course microsoft bought it to steal software more efficiently.
>
> Steal what? It is already freely available. This is just more FUD spread by
> people who fail to comprehend the actual logistics o
Anonymous (Carmel NY) wrote:
of course microsoft bought it to steal software more efficiently.
Steal what? It is already freely available. This is just more FUD spread by
people who fail to comprehend the actual logistics of the situation.
Unless you have a repo marked as private. Good luck
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:37:39 +0200, Wojciech Puchar stated:
>On Sat, 16 Jun 2018, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
>> A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase
>> of GitHub affect future development? After all, they'll get to call the
>> shots...[*] The only good thing that
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 8:27 AM Dave Horsfall wrote:
A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase
of GitHub affect future development?
In what ways do you suspect that Microsoft's purchase of GitHub will
affect futur
what forces you or anyone to use github.
Git doesn't need it. works locally.
remote repository could be over nfs, ssh, ftp or whatever you like.
this is a problem only for people so lazy that are unable to setup remote
repository. or because "project manager" decided to use github
of course mi
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 8:27 AM Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
> A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase
> of GitHub affect future development?
In what ways do you suspect that Microsoft's purchase of GitHub will
affect future FreeBSD development?
FreeBSD hosts its own r
> On 15. Jun 2018, at 18:37, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>
>> github != git
>
> I didn't say that it was; did you misunderstand my message or something?
> someone looking for an alternative to something now owned by M$
Your email sounded like you’re
Hi!
> > github != git
>
> I didn't say that it was; did you misunderstand my message or something?
Well, your message suggests moving to a different version
control system because of github. But why should git itself
be touched by this move ? gitlab or gitea or other open source
solutions use gi
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Michael Gmelin wrote:
github != git
I didn't say that it was; did you misunderstand my message or something?
-- Dave
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscr
On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 00:26:36 +1000 (EST) "Dave Horsfall"
said
A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase
of GitHub affect future development? After all, they'll get to call the
shots...[*] The only good thing that came out of M$ is their RTF document
format (u
> On 15. Jun 2018, at 16:26, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
> A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase of
> GitHub affect future development? After all, they'll get to call the
> shots...[*] The only good thing that came out of M$ is their RTF document
> format (us
A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase
of GitHub affect future development? After all, they'll get to call the
shots...[*] The only good thing that came out of M$ is their RTF document
format (used natively by the Mac's TextEdit utility, for example), which
b
13 matches
Mail list logo
