In response to Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:20:53AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > > > Even bet
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:20:53AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > > Even better would be for make to realize that it's only doing the
> > >
Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > Even better would be for make to realize that it's only doing the
> > > fetching, and do it anyway.
> >
> > That still doesn't help with the
On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > Even better would be for make to realize that it's only doing the
> > fetching, and do it anyway.
>
> That still doesn't help with the problem of a user who starts a 10MB
> download that wo
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> Even better would be for make to realize that it's only doing the
> fetching, and do it anyway.
That still doesn't help with the problem of a user who starts a 10MB
download that won't work on his architecture or OS release. The code
i
In response to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon):
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 08:58:55AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > Why? Is there a legitimate reason why the fetch process refuses to
> > download this?
>
> The intention of the logic is to warn a user, as soon as possible, that
> they are spending
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 08:58:55AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> Why? Is there a legitimate reason why the fetch process refuses to
> download this?
The intention of the logic is to warn a user, as soon as possible, that
they are spending time on something that will wind up being IGNOREd if
it is in
In response to Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:14:32AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > Sounds like a +CONFLICTS type of issue (the MySQL client and server files
> > for instance install some libs in the same spot, so they conflict IIRC).
>
> Not as far as I k
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:14:32AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Sounds like a +CONFLICTS type of issue (the MySQL client and server files
> for instance install some libs in the same spot, so they conflict IIRC).
Not as far as I know. "make install" in databases/mysql50-server
will cause dat
In response to Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/databases/postgresql82-server]# make
> > fetch-recursive
> > ===> Fetching all distfiles for postgresql-server-8.2.4_1 and dependencies
> > ===> postgresql-server-8.2.4_1 cannot install: the p
Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/databases/postgresql82-server]# make
fetch-recursive
===> Fetching all distfiles for postgresql-server-8.2.4_1 and dependencies
===> postgresql-server-8.2.4_1 cannot install: the port wants
postgresql82-client but you have postgresql81-client inst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/databases/postgresql82-server]# make
fetch-recursive
===> Fetching all distfiles for postgresql-server-8.2.4_1 and dependencies
===> postgresql-server-8.2.4_1 cannot install: the port wants
postgresql82-client but you have postgresql81-client installed.
*** Error co
12 matches
Mail list logo
