Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere

2018-01-30 Thread Yasuhiro KIMURA
From: Don Lewis <truck...@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:31:26 -0800 (PST) >> have you tried: DISABLE_LICENSES=yes > > Or LICENSES_ACCEPTED=NONE in the poudriere.d/make.conf. I've got > LICENSES_ACCEPTED=jg

Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere

2018-01-30 Thread Don Lewis
On 30 Jan, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Am 30.01.2018 um 19:32 schrieb Yasuhiro KIMURA: >> I would like to build security/bruteforceblocker with poudriere. This >> port have one options. But it has nothing to do with my question. The >> source of problem is license information. There is no license >>

Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere

2018-01-30 Thread Yasuhiro KIMURA
From: Matthias Fechner <ide...@fechner.net> Subject: Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:38:08 +0100 > have you tried: DISABLE_LICENSES=yes Oh, It's just what I would like to know. I fully understood explaining in detail helps me to get right answe

Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere

2018-01-30 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 30.01.2018 um 19:32 schrieb Yasuhiro KIMURA: > I would like to build security/bruteforceblocker with poudriere. This > port have one options. But it has nothing to do with my question. The > source of problem is license information. There is no license > information about this software either

Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere

2018-01-30 Thread Yasuhiro KIMURA
From: blubee blubeeme <gurenc...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:57:06 +0800 > I don't think that you can do what you are asking but with the bulk build > options, > you can use poudriere options [poudriere options] f

Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere

2018-01-30 Thread Mathieu Arnold
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 04:04:56AM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > Hello. > > Poudriere sets 'BATCH=yes' when it builds ports. But there are some > ports that can't be built with batch mode. Then are there any way to > build such interactive ports with poudriere or do I have to build > other

Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere

2018-01-30 Thread mokhi
Hi :) Not sure if I got your question well. (I assume you want to choose options interactively while using poudriere for testing ports). AFAIK, There's an option -c for that that runs `make config` before building the port (you can then select options interactively). Best regards.

Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere

2018-01-29 Thread blubee blubeeme
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:04 AM, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > Hello. > > Poudriere sets 'BATCH=yes' when it builds ports. But there are some > ports that can't be built with batch mode. Then are there any way to > build such interactive ports with poudriere or do I have to build >

Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere

2014-08-23 Thread Chris Rees
On 18/08/2014 06:21, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Sunday, August 17, 2014 a las 07:21:06PM -0500, Greg Rivers escribió: What's the proper way to tell poudriere to accept a license? Example: # DISABLE_LICENSES=yes poudriere bulk -j 100amd64 sysutils/fusefs-exfat sysutils/exfat-utils

Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere

2014-08-17 Thread Greg Rivers
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, I wrote: What's the proper way to tell poudriere to accept a license? Example: # DISABLE_LICENSES=yes poudriere bulk -j 100amd64 sysutils/fusefs-exfat sysutils/exfat-utils [snip] Building 2 packages using 2 builders Starting/Cloning builders Hit CTRL+t at

Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere

2014-08-17 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Sunday, August 17, 2014 a las 07:21:06PM -0500, Greg Rivers escribió: What's the proper way to tell poudriere to accept a license? Example: # DISABLE_LICENSES=yes poudriere bulk -j 100amd64 sysutils/fusefs-exfat sysutils/exfat-utils [snip] Building 2 packages using 2 builders