From: Don Lewis <truck...@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:31:26 -0800 (PST)
>> have you tried: DISABLE_LICENSES=yes
>
> Or LICENSES_ACCEPTED=NONE in the poudriere.d/make.conf. I've got
> LICENSES_ACCEPTED=jg
On 30 Jan, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> Am 30.01.2018 um 19:32 schrieb Yasuhiro KIMURA:
>> I would like to build security/bruteforceblocker with poudriere. This
>> port have one options. But it has nothing to do with my question. The
>> source of problem is license information. There is no license
>>
From: Matthias Fechner <ide...@fechner.net>
Subject: Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:38:08 +0100
> have you tried: DISABLE_LICENSES=yes
Oh, It's just what I would like to know. I fully understood explaining
in detail helps me to get right answe
Am 30.01.2018 um 19:32 schrieb Yasuhiro KIMURA:
> I would like to build security/bruteforceblocker with poudriere. This
> port have one options. But it has nothing to do with my question. The
> source of problem is license information. There is no license
> information about this software either
From: blubee blubeeme <gurenc...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:57:06 +0800
> I don't think that you can do what you are asking but with the bulk build
> options,
> you can use poudriere options [poudriere options] f
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 04:04:56AM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Poudriere sets 'BATCH=yes' when it builds ports. But there are some
> ports that can't be built with batch mode. Then are there any way to
> build such interactive ports with poudriere or do I have to build
> other
Hi :)
Not sure if I got your question well.
(I assume you want to choose options interactively while using
poudriere for testing ports).
AFAIK, There's an option -c for that that runs `make config` before
building the port (you can then select options interactively).
Best regards.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:04 AM, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Poudriere sets 'BATCH=yes' when it builds ports. But there are some
> ports that can't be built with batch mode. Then are there any way to
> build such interactive ports with poudriere or do I have to build
>
On 18/08/2014 06:21, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Sunday, August 17, 2014 a las 07:21:06PM -0500, Greg Rivers escribió:
What's the proper way to tell poudriere to accept a license?
Example:
# DISABLE_LICENSES=yes poudriere bulk -j 100amd64 sysutils/fusefs-exfat
sysutils/exfat-utils
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, I wrote:
What's the proper way to tell poudriere to accept a license?
Example:
# DISABLE_LICENSES=yes poudriere bulk -j 100amd64 sysutils/fusefs-exfat
sysutils/exfat-utils
[snip]
Building 2 packages using 2 builders
Starting/Cloning builders
Hit CTRL+t at
El día Sunday, August 17, 2014 a las 07:21:06PM -0500, Greg Rivers escribió:
What's the proper way to tell poudriere to accept a license?
Example:
# DISABLE_LICENSES=yes poudriere bulk -j 100amd64 sysutils/fusefs-exfat
sysutils/exfat-utils
[snip]
Building 2 packages using 2 builders
11 matches
Mail list logo