On 23.03.2011 13:05, Gritsuk Anton wrote:
On 22.03.2011 16:09, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
22.03.2011 00:58, Heino Tiedemann пишет:
Gritsuk Anton wrote:
On 19.03.2011 02:47, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
It calles itself not loger Release Candidate:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD
On 22.03.2011 16:09, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
22.03.2011 00:58, Heino Tiedemann пишет:
Gritsuk Anton wrote:
On 19.03.2011 02:47, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
It calles itself not loger Release Candidate:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:2.0)
Gecko/20100101
Firefox/4.0
22.03.2011 00:58, Heino Tiedemann пишет:
Gritsuk Anton wrote:
On 19.03.2011 02:47, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
It calles itself not loger Release Candidate:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/4.0
RC1 doesn't call itself "release candidate" either
Gritsuk Anton wrote:
> On 19.03.2011 02:47, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>>> It calles itself not loger Release Candidate:
>>> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101
>>> Firefox/4.0
>> RC1 doesn't call itself "release candidate" either:
>> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBS
On 19.03.2011 02:47, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
It calles itself not loger Release Candidate:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/4.0
RC1 doesn't call itself "release candidate" either:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/
On 03/19/11 16:34, Denny Lin wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:28:04AM -0700, Patrick Powell wrote:
On 03/19/11 00:02, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:28 -0600
"Edwin L. Culp W." wrote:
I'm assuming that we are close to having firefox4 in the tree as
firefox. It can't be t
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:28:04AM -0700, Patrick Powell wrote:
> On 03/19/11 00:02, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:28 -0600
> >"Edwin L. Culp W." wrote:
> >
> >>I'm assuming that we are close to having firefox4 in the tree as
> >>firefox. It can't be too soon. I have not fo
On 03/19/11 00:02, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:28 -0600
"Edwin L. Culp W." wrote:
I'm assuming that we are close to having firefox4 in the tree as
firefox. It can't be too soon. I have not found any drawbacks to it
in the couple weeks of testing.
Unfortunately, it stil
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:28 -0600
"Edwin L. Culp W." wrote:
> I'm assuming that we are close to having firefox4 in the tree as
> firefox. It can't be too soon. I have not found any drawbacks to it
> in the couple weeks of testing.
>
Unfortunately, it still goes crazy like the older versions
Heino Tiedemann wrote:
> > However, the _only_ difference is the addition of a FIREFOX_4_0_RELEASE
> > tag to .hgtags. So don't bother rebuilding.
>
> One more difference is:
There are *no* other differences. I diff(1)ed the source trees.
> It calles itself not loger Release Candidate:
> Bui
na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
> Edwin L. Culp W. wrote:
>
>> > I installed the ReleaseCandidate1 from firefox-devel. Is thery any
>> > change in since the move from firefox-devel to www/firefox, that I
>> > should rebuild the RC1?
>>
>> I would assume not because, I ereased f
2011/3/18 Christian Weisgerber :
> Edwin L. Culp W. wrote:
>
>> > I installed the ReleaseCandidate1 from firefox-devel. Is thery any
>> > change in since the move from firefox-devel to www/firefox, that I
>> > should rebuild the RC1?
>>
>> I would assume not because, I ereased firefox-devel from
Edwin L. Culp W. wrote:
> > I installed the ReleaseCandidate1 from firefox-devel. Is thery any
> > change in since the move from firefox-devel to www/firefox, that I
> > should rebuild the RC1?
>
> I would assume not because, I ereased firefox-devel from ports a few
> hours ago and updated www/
2011/3/18 Heino Tiedemann :
> "Edwin L. Culp W." wrote:
>
>> I screwed up. This should have gone to ports. Sorry, Heino.
>>
>> 2011/3/18 Edwin L. Culp W. :
>>> 2011/3/6 Heino Tiedemann :
Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
> On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
>> Any manpage or ho
"Edwin L. Culp W." wrote:
> I screwed up. This should have gone to ports. Sorry, Heino.
>
> 2011/3/18 Edwin L. Culp W. :
>> 2011/3/6 Heino Tiedemann :
>>> Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
>>>
On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
> Any manpage or howto how I can gat this on my computer?
I screwed up. This should have gone to ports. Sorry, Heino.
2011/3/18 Edwin L. Culp W. :
> 2011/3/6 Heino Tiedemann :
>> Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
>>
>>> On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
Any manpage or howto how I can gat this on my computer? Do I need SVN
for that
>>>
>>> 1.
Heino Tiedemann wrote:
> https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox-devel/
> >
> > Alternatively, just use the "Download in other formats: Zip Archive"
> > link on the abovementioned page.
>
> I cannot find it - where exactly?
It's actually a different U
na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
> Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
>
>> >> Firefox 4 lives at:
>> https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox-devel/
>> >
>> > Any manpage or howto how I can gat this on my computer? Do I need SVN
>> > for that
>>
>>
06.03.2011 19:59, Sergey Nikolenko пишет:
On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
maybe into www/firefox-devel?
Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12" - what means it is the release
candidate.
Firefox 4 is available for FreeBSD
Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
> >> Firefox 4 lives at:
> https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox-devel/
> >
> > Any manpage or howto how I can gat this on my computer? Do I need SVN
> > for that
>
> 1. cd /usr/ports/devel/subversion; make install clean
Alte
Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Heino Tiedemann
>> Yes, it is Fast! I belive it is even faster on startup...
>>
>> One Question:
>>
>> Do I HAVE TO put it into my ports tree? Or can I put it somewhere into
>> my home directory tree?
>>
>> e.g.
>> 1 cd ~/myports/www
>> 2 svn
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Heino Tiedemann
wrote:
> Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
>
>> On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
>>
> is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
>
> maybe into www/firefox-devel?
>
>
> Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12"
> Do I HAVE TO put it into my ports tree? Or can I put it somewhere into
> my home directory tree?
>
> e.g.
> 1 cd ~/myports/www
> 2 svn co
> https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox-devel
> 3 cd firefox-devel
> 4 make install clean
>
>
> Does that work?
Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
> On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
>
is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
maybe into www/firefox-devel?
Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12" - what means it is the release
candidate.
>>>
>>> Firefox 4 is
Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
> On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
>> Any manpage or howto how I can gat this on my computer? Do I need SVN
>> for that
>
> 1. cd /usr/ports/devel/subversion; make install clean
> 2. cd /usr/ports/www
> 3. svn co
> https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gec
On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
maybe into www/firefox-devel?
Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12" - what means it is the release
candidate.
Firefox 4 is available for FreeBSD for a long time in our development
reposito
Beat Gaetzi wrote:
> On 05.03.2011 12:48, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
>>
>> maybe into www/firefox-devel?
>>
>>
>> Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12" - what means it is the release
>> candidate.
>
> Firefox 4 is available
On 03/05/2011 12:49, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
Is there realy Java needed somewhere in the web?
Yes.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the rig
Jerry wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:48:43 +0100
> Heino Tiedemann articulated:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
>>
>> maybe into www/firefox-devel?
>>
>>
>> Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12" - what means it is the release
>> candidate.
>>
>> I
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 14:48:51 +0100
Beat Gaetzi wrote:
> On 05.03.2011 12:48, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
> >
> > maybe into www/firefox-devel?
> >
> >
> > Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12" - what means it is the releas
On 05.03.2011 12:48, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
>
> maybe into www/firefox-devel?
>
>
> Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12" - what means it is the release
> candidate.
Firefox 4 is available for FreeBSD for a long time in our
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 07:25:47AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> Will this new version alleviate the long standing problem of "java" not
> working? If not, perhaps time might be better spend getting the latest
> version of "java" working correctly with Firefox before wasting more
> time porting products th
openjdk is working very well with FreeBSD.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:48:43 +0100
> Heino Tiedemann articulated:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
> >
> > maybe into www/firefox-devel?
> >
> >
> > Firefox 4 i
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:48:43 +0100
Heino Tiedemann articulated:
> Hi,
>
> is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
>
> maybe into www/firefox-devel?
>
>
> Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12" - what means it is the release
> candidate.
>
> I use it already on Windows in t
On 5 Mar 2011 11:57, "Martin Wilke" wrote:
>
> how about the gecko repo ?
>
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Gecko
>
>
?
Error 503 Service Unavailable
Service Unavailable
Guru Meditation:
XID: 824546156
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
how about the gecko repo ?
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Gecko
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
>
> maybe into www/firefox-devel?
>
>
> Firefox 4 is in the State "beta 12" - what means it is the release
> cand
36 matches
Mail list logo
