On Fri, 18 May 2007, James Snyder wrote:
Regarding the trials and tribulations. I did not, at first, get the message
that one shouldn't overlay the testing tree on top of the older tree, and did
the first libXft upgrade at that point. That failed and subsequently I
needed to do a series
So, I've upgraded one more machine, an X60 Tablet, and have run into
some issues on this one. First and most important, my ability to use the
1920x1200 resolution has disappeared. I've been using the 915resolution
tool to add this mode to the 945GM bios, but Xorg now insists there is
no mode of
Another successful upgrade to report, although not without some trials
and tribulations. The end result is that I have things going with the
NVIDIA drivers, compositing works (I've even fired up Compiz and though
that's not 100% stable, it's quite usable so long as a few things are
avoided.
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:24:02PM -0500, James Snyder wrote:
Window decorations died once while switching back and forth to another
virtual terminal and GL screensavers hang up (first frame rendered,
subsequent ones do not).
I've been meaning to post on this subject, though have been looking
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:06:59AM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
Le Lun 7 mai 07 ? 22:58:50 +0200, Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?crivait?:
The other problem is that if you're going to automatically update all
the dependencies for a port, you need to upgrade all the
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 01:06:02PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
At the same time, I think it's probably worthwhile to examine what the
goals of the ports system are in this regard. If the goal is to always
provide a fail-safe upgrade path for users then perhaps we should be
talking about
Would you please inform the progress (or, schedule), so far?
port tree looks very quiet in these few days and I cannot see any xorg7.2 in
my cvsup'd port tree...
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
2007/5/8, Ken Yamada [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Would you please inform the progress (or, schedule), so far?
port tree looks very quiet in these few days and I cannot see any xorg7.2 in
my cvsup'd port tree...
Currently most development happens in the git repository. You can
look at
From: Rene Ladan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Currently most development happens in the git repository. You can
look at http://git.xbsd.org/?p=freebsd/ports.git;a=summary to see what
goes on.
No, http://wiki.freebsd.org/ModularXorg; says;
--Quote--
Disclaimer
If you read about the git repository,
Ken Yamada wrote:
From: Rene Ladan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Currently most development happens in the git repository. You can
look at http://git.xbsd.org/?p=freebsd/ports.git;a=summary to see what
goes on.
No, http://wiki.freebsd.org/ModularXorg; says;
--Quote--
Disclaimer
If you read
Thank you, Florent.
I understand that we need to be patient another two days...
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is a
huge and disruptive change, we're going to approach it very carefully.
Good news that this is moving forward! Congrats to
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:38:46AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is a
huge and disruptive change, we're going to approach it very
On Mon, 07 May 2007 13:42:31 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:38:46AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade.
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
No, at a minimum I am not comfortable recommending its use until it
saves old shared libraries across updates (I sent you email about this
a while ago), which is a vital safety and robustness mechanism.
I am one of people
On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:14:48 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
No, at a minimum I am not comfortable recommending its use until it
saves old shared libraries across updates (I sent you email about this
a while
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:35:48PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:14:48 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
No, at a minimum I am not comfortable recommending its use until it
saves old
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 04:44:14PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:35:48PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:14:48 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
No, at a
On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:44:14 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:35:48PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:14:48 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:09:06PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
No, at a
Le Lun 7 mai 07 à 22:58:50 +0200, Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrivait :
The other problem is that if you're going to automatically update all
the dependencies for a port, you need to upgrade all the stuff that
depends on them as well. For example the gettext upgrade got triggered
on my
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:06:59AM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
Le Lun 7 mai 07 ? 22:58:50 +0200, Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?crivait?:
The other problem is that if you're going to automatically update all
the dependencies for a port, you need to upgrade all the stuff that
depends
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:06:59AM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
Le Lun 7 mai 07 ? 22:58:50 +0200, Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?crivait?:
The other problem is that if you're going to automatically update all
the dependencies for a port, you need to upgrade all the stuff that
depends
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 18:26 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I dispute the correctness of this entry. The old libraries in
lib/compat/pkg are not linked to directly by new builds. The only
situation in which something might end up being linked to 2 versions
of the library is if it pulls in a
Brian Gruber wrote:
Ok, no worries then. I have no plans to add that
feature at this time,
partly because there has been no user demand for it,
and mostly
because I don't like the idea. I recognize however
that reasonable
minds may differ on that topic.
if you don't like the idea, that's
/usr/local
Hello.
Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
thanks,
MC
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mal content wrote:
/usr/local
Hello.
Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
thanks,
MC
A version dependant directory structure hasn't been a good idea in the first
place. No one was really able to tell weather to put a port into /usr/X11R6 or
/usr/local anyway.
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:43:47PM +0100, mal content wrote:
/usr/local
Hello.
Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
/usr/local is the new de facto standard, AFAIK no-one is using
/usr/X11R7.
Kris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On 03/05/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:43:47PM +0100, mal content wrote:
/usr/local
Hello.
Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
/usr/local is the new de facto standard, AFAIK no-one is using
/usr/X11R7.
Kris
Oh, OK.
thanks,
MC
On Thursday 03 May 2007 19:12:45 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
mal content wrote:
/usr/local
Hello.
Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
thanks,
MC
A version dependant directory structure hasn't been a good idea in the
first place. No one was really able to tell
Danny Pansters writes:
/usr/X11R6 was a long standing bug about to be fixed once and for
all. IIRC it originated from fixed paths in the old XFree. It
won't be missed or mourned :)
While I understand why this is going to happen, I've been of
the opinion it ought to be retained with
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 15:37 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Danny Pansters writes:
/usr/X11R6 was a long standing bug about to be fixed once and for
all. IIRC it originated from fixed paths in the old XFree. It
won't be missed or mourned :)
While I understand why this is going to
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:40:26PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is a
huge and disruptive
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:40:26PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Secondly, X7.2 as I tried it wouldn't startx if some other login had
created a .Xauthority file. While rm .Xauthority solved the problem
completely, I don't think this is user
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Martin Tournoij wrote:
On Wed 02 May 2007 14:05, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:26:25PM -0600, Coleman Kane wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 15:43 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:40:26PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
In particular all ports committers are expected to participate in this
process of eating our own dogfood :)
Our marketing folks educated me to use the phrase drinking our own
champagne instead. :)
5) CVS will stay frozen for a period to be evaluated
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 15:43 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:40:26PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:36:03PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
In particular all ports committers are expected to participate in this
process of eating our own dogfood :)
Our marketing folks educated me to use the phrase drinking our own
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:36:03PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Does this freeze apply to the whole ports tree, or only (relatively
directly) affected parts of the tree?
The latter is basically most of the tree :-)
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:31:59PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
3) Once the proposed upgrade method is in place, we will publish a
tarball of the prepared ports tree and request that *all* our ports
developers test the upgrade on their own machines before it is
committed to CVS. There are many
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:31:59PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is a
huge and disruptive change, we're going to approach it very carefully.
The
41 matches
Mail list logo
