Re: Might an UPDATING entry be appropriate for a MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION bump?

2020-10-05 Thread Tatsuki Makino
David Wolfskill wrote on 2020/10/06 08:45: > > But in order for them to be built, you need to have updated > ports-mgmt/pkg ahead of time, or this kind of thing happens: > > | ... > | ===> Cleaning for nvidia-driver-440.100_1 > | ===> nvidia-driver-440.100_1 pkg(8) must be version 1.15.9 or

Re: Might an UPDATING entry be appropriate for a MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION bump?

2020-10-05 Thread David Wolfskill
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 08:31:05AM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Hello. > > In my case, > -x \*-kmod-\[0-9gv\] is added to portmaster because all packages that > install kernel modules contain -kmod in their names. This excludes *-kmod. > And when they are upgraded, I won't be installing them

Re: Might an UPDATING entry be appropriate for a MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION bump?

2020-10-05 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. In my case, -x \*-kmod-\[0-9gv\] is added to portmaster because all packages that install kernel modules contain -kmod in their names. This excludes *-kmod. And when they are upgraded, I won't be installing them right away. Then to install them I write PORTS_MODULES in src.conf.