Re: Open discution for a fakeroot support for the ports infrastructure

2009-09-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
FAKE_MAKEARGS?= ${MAKE_ARGS} ${DESTDIRNAME}=${FAKE_DESTDIR} in this bsd.fake.mk DESTDIRNAME= DESTDIR normally all ./configure/gmake/gmake install supports DESTIR during the gmake install gmake install is replaced by gmake DESTFIR=$FAKE_DESTDIR} install which does the job well. but there

Re: Open discution for a fakeroot support for the ports infrastructure

2009-09-02 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Mon, 31.08.2009 at 23:26:43 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, I've written some patches for the ports infrastructure importing the fakeroot implementation from midnightbsd ports. In my first implementation the fake directory was enabled by default, no ports had to be modified to

Re: Open discution for a fakeroot support for the ports infrastructure

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:26:43PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, I've written some patches for the ports infrastructure importing the fakeroot implementation from midnightbsd ports. That's actually a good idea. I'm quite used to fakeroot already from some work I've been doing in

Re: Open discution for a fakeroot support for the ports infrastructure

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:02:24AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: [snip] This is done either for very, very simple programs where it would be unnecessary overhead to recurse into the upstream's Makefile and run its install target, or for programs where the upstream doesn't even *have* an install

Re: Open discution for a fakeroot support for the ports infrastructure

2009-09-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Fucking gmail, I replyed in private instead of the list so here is the reply, sorry That's actually a good idea. I'm quite used to fakeroot already from some work I've been doing in Debian. Currently the fakeroot is not something like the debian fakeroot, ie it is just a directory that is