On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:20:53AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Even better would be for make to realize that it's only doing the
fetching, and
In response to Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:20:53AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Even better would be for make
Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Even better would be for make to realize that it's only doing the
fetching, and do it anyway.
That still doesn't help with the problem of a
Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/databases/postgresql82-server]# make
fetch-recursive
=== Fetching all distfiles for postgresql-server-8.2.4_1 and dependencies
=== postgresql-server-8.2.4_1 cannot install: the port wants
postgresql82-client but you have postgresql81-client
In response to Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/databases/postgresql82-server]# make
fetch-recursive
=== Fetching all distfiles for postgresql-server-8.2.4_1 and dependencies
=== postgresql-server-8.2.4_1 cannot install: the port wants
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:14:32AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Sounds like a +CONFLICTS type of issue (the MySQL client and server files
for instance install some libs in the same spot, so they conflict IIRC).
Not as far as I know. make install in databases/mysql50-server
will cause
In response to Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:14:32AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Sounds like a +CONFLICTS type of issue (the MySQL client and server files
for instance install some libs in the same spot, so they conflict IIRC).
Not as far as I know.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 08:58:55AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Why? Is there a legitimate reason why the fetch process refuses to
download this?
The intention of the logic is to warn a user, as soon as possible, that
they are spending time on something that will wind up being IGNOREd if
it is
In response to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Linimon):
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 08:58:55AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Why? Is there a legitimate reason why the fetch process refuses to
download this?
The intention of the logic is to warn a user, as soon as possible, that
they are spending time
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Even better would be for make to realize that it's only doing the
fetching, and do it anyway.
That still doesn't help with the problem of a user who starts a 10MB
download that won't work on his architecture or OS release. The code
is
On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Even better would be for make to realize that it's only doing the
fetching, and do it anyway.
That still doesn't help with the problem of a user who starts a 10MB
download that won't
11 matches
Mail list logo
