Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default?

2013-05-23 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:09:02AM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: Hi, Since we are back on normal rolling packages update for stable and I got pointyhat-west up to do some testing, I would like to move on with this case. I just wonder if someone already has a patch to make it as default, else

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default?

2013-05-23 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 5/23/2013 2:56 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:09:02AM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: Hi, Since we are back on normal rolling packages update for stable and I got pointyhat-west up to do some testing, I would like to move on with this case. I just wonder if someone

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default?

2013-05-23 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:18:26AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 5/23/2013 2:56 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: FORCE_MAKE_JOBS is removed because it is the default. While here, I've moved empty(MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER) check higher, IMHO where it should belong, also saves a few lines. Reviews are

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default?

2013-05-23 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 5/23/2013 8:00 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:18:26AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 5/23/2013 2:56 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: FORCE_MAKE_JOBS is removed because it is the default. While here, I've moved empty(MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER) check higher, IMHO where it should

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default?

2013-05-23 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 09:14:21AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 5/23/2013 8:00 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:18:26AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 5/23/2013 2:56 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: FORCE_MAKE_JOBS is removed because it is the default. While here, I've

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default?

2013-05-21 Thread Martin Wilke
Hi, Since we are back on normal rolling packages update for stable and I got pointyhat-west up to do some testing, I would like to move on with this case. I just wonder if someone already has a patch to make it as default, else I will have a look at it within this week. - Martin On Mar 15,

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default?

2013-03-14 Thread Eitan Adler
My proposal: - start an exp-run with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS set - mark all new failures with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE - flip the default right after the 9.1 release. Now that we seem to have exp-run support again it is time to re-raise this issue. Can we please have an exp-run, mark all the failures,

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default?

2013-03-14 Thread Martin Wilke
I added Alexey here because he had asked for the same since few weeks ago. Yes we are able to do exp-runs now. But to be honest the ports tree is in general in bad stat, our priority for the moment is to fix the ports tree to get a good package set for the 8.4 release. After we are done with

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default?

2013-01-16 Thread Eitan Adler
On 11 September 2012 12:13, Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org wrote: 2012/9/4 Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net: My proposal: - start an exp-run with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS set - mark all new failures with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE - flip the default right after the 9.1 release. ... It has been months since I

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default?

2013-01-16 Thread Chris Rees
On 16 January 2013 20:48, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: On 11 September 2012 12:13, Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org wrote: 2012/9/4 Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net: My proposal: - start an exp-run with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS set - mark all new failures with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE - flip the

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default?

2012-09-11 Thread Olivier Smedts
2012/9/4 Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net: My proposal: - start an exp-run with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS set - mark all new failures with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE - flip the default right after the 9.1 release. +1 too except for devel/libftdi which just failed on me right now, was ok after setting

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default?

2012-09-04 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 9/4/2012 12:17 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: When MAKE_JOBS was originally introduced the intent was to flip the default after some amount of time and testing. Last this issue came up there were objections based on the 7.4 release, 8.2 release, gmake upgrade, and other wide scale changes. I

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE as default

2011-03-14 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:14:46PM +0300, Anonymous wrote: Alexey Dokuchaev da...@freebsd.org writes: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 07:12:22AM -0600, Ade Lovett wrote: Given that we're _really_ close to 7.4/8.2 -- not this side of January mumble -- random uneducated guess. In time for 9.0. I

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE as default

2011-03-13 Thread Anonymous
Alexey Dokuchaev da...@freebsd.org writes: On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 07:12:22AM -0600, Ade Lovett wrote: On Dec 23, 2010, at 03:18 , Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: I'd really like to see that happen. If there is anything I can help with, don't hesitate to ask. :-) Given that we're _really_

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE as default

2010-12-23 Thread Ade Lovett
On Dec 23, 2010, at 03:18 , Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: I'd really like to see that happen. If there is anything I can help with, don't hesitate to ask. :-) Given that we're _really_ close to 7.4/8.2 -- not this side of January mumble -- random uneducated guess. In time for 9.0. -aDe

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE as default

2010-12-23 Thread Dominic Fandrey
This is a resend, because I forgot to CC ports. On 23/12/2010 10:18, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: Hi there, As far as I remember, when _MAKE_JOBS functionality was introduced, one of the ultimate goals was to flip the switch at some point so ports are built with -jX unless marked as

Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE as default

2010-12-23 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 07:12:22AM -0600, Ade Lovett wrote: On Dec 23, 2010, at 03:18 , Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: I'd really like to see that happen. If there is anything I can help with, don't hesitate to ask. :-) Given that we're _really_ close to 7.4/8.2 -- not this side of January