On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Vsevolod Stakhov vsevo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 11/08/14 14:57, CeDeROM wrote:
Mayeb its time to decide if one of TeTeX and/or TeXlive should be abandoned?
:-)
TeTeX is abandoned.
ACK! :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
On 11/08/14 14:57, CeDeROM wrote:
Mayeb its time to decide if one of TeTeX and/or TeXlive should be abandoned?
:-)
TeTeX is abandoned.
--
Vsevolod Stakhov
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Hiroki Sato wrote:
If you want to use TeXLive, please try to use the following knob:
TEX_DEFAULT= texlive
[snip]
Please test TeXLive and send your failure report to me. Once it is
confirmed that TEX_DEFAULT=texlive works, I will switch the default
value from tetex to texlive at some
David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote
in CAO+PfDe0nEdG=6zvnce90ktjsy4jyrk9jr1pmfbawrbj5cb...@mail.gmail.com:
de 2013/5/12 Florent Peterschmitt flor...@peterschmitt.fr:
de Le 11/05/2013 20:36, Hiroki Sato a écrit :
de Hello,
de
de As you already noticed, TeXLive ports have been
On 16 May 2013 14:02, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven f...@skysmurf.nl wrote:
Hiroki Sato wrote:
If you want to use TeXLive, please try to use the following knob:
TEX_DEFAULT= texlive
[snip]
Please test TeXLive and send your failure report to me. Once it is
confirmed that
Chris Rees wrote:
Thanks for your message But :)
Hey, I'm just the messenger ;-)
* print/latex-cjk has option DVIPDFMX hardcoded to teTeX stuff.
That is a problem for the latex-cjk port maintainer.
* print/freetype-tools's RUNDEPEND=t1asm is hard coded to teTeX and
conflicted
Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote
in 51941f70.2060...@gmx.de:
ma I have been looking at the texlive-base and -texmf ports, prompted by a
ma discussion on IRC involving marino, Niclas Zeising and myself, and I
ma must say that I am impressed - not to say scared - by the sheer size of
Am 11.05.2013 20:36, schrieb Hiroki Sato:
Hello,
As you already noticed, TeXLive ports have been imported and one can
choose teTeX or TeXLive while the default value for pre-compiled
packages is still teTeX.
If you want to use TeXLive, please try to use the following knob:
Le 11/05/2013 20:36, Hiroki Sato a écrit :
Hello,
As you already noticed, TeXLive ports have been imported and one can
choose teTeX or TeXLive while the default value for pre-compiled
packages is still teTeX.
If you want to use TeXLive, please try to use the following knob:
Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org writes:
Once it is confirmed that TEX_DEFAULT=texlive works, I will switch
the default value from tetex to texlive at some point.
Thanks a lot for all the work. Is removing tetex a middle or long-term
goal?
___
Anh Ky Huynh wrote:
Hi all,
I often use TeXLive instead of teTeX which isn't been developed anymore. After
I remove teTeX from system, I encounter some problems when building/upgrading
ports. For example, _evince_, _lyx_ couldn't be built without teTeX. (In fact,
evince and lyx can be used
2009/12/12 Frank Staals fr...@fstaals.net:
Anh Ky Huynh wrote:
Hi all,
I often use TeXLive instead of teTeX which isn't been developed anymore.
After I remove teTeX from system, I encounter some problems when
building/upgrading ports. For example, _evince_, _lyx_ couldn't be built
without
On 14/déc - 08:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
2009/12/12 Frank Staals fr...@fstaals.net:
Anh Ky Huynh wrote:
Hi all,
I often use TeXLive instead of teTeX which isn't been developed anymore.
After I remove teTeX from system, I encounter some problems when
building/upgrading ports. For
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:16:04 +0100
Marc Lagrange rha...@gruik.at wrote:
On 14/déc - 08:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
2009/12/12 Frank Staals fr...@fstaals.net:
Anh Ky Huynh wrote:
Hi all,
I often use TeXLive instead of teTeX which isn't been
developed anymore. After I remove
I didn't try http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/ yet but as far as I
read in the wiki page
http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/wiki/Installing
this port is for *TeXLive 2008* only. TeXLive 2008 has binaries files for
FreeBSD (so I can install TeXLive from the live CD
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
On Sun, 16.12.2007 at 22:59:55 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
This is a progress report from the current teTeX maintainer who is
trying to update TeX in the ports tree to TeXLive. As I explained,
if we go with the finer-grained package model, over 1000 ports have
to be
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
On Sun, 16.12.2007 at 22:59:55 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
This is a progress report from the current teTeX maintainer who is
trying to update TeX in the ports tree to TeXLive. As I explained,
if we go with the finer-grained package model, over 1000 ports have
to be
On Sun, 16.12.2007 at 22:59:55 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
This is a progress report from the current teTeX maintainer who is
trying to update TeX in the ports tree to TeXLive. As I explained,
if we go with the finer-grained package model, over 1000 ports have
to be added at a time, so
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Hiroki Sato thusly...
...
I have tried to create TeXLive port and have some working results,
but I cannot commit it because the following issues still remain:
1. Compatibility with other packages which uses TeX. Some depend
on old teTeX structure,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:59:55PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Nikola Le??i?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
2. Finer-grained package management is needed. Creating a TeXLive
port as one very large package is possible but I do not think it
would work well. There are many people who do not
Le 17/12/2007 à 11:02:45+0900, Hiroki Sato a écrit
Bakul Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ba Why not add TeXLive port even as it is, so that people can
ba play with it? As for modularization, I hope you don't go the
ba extreme of a zillion little pieces but instead
Nikola Lečić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ni On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:43:00
ni Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ni
ni On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Nikola Lečić wrote:
ni [...]
ni I must add that I tried two times to contact two FreeBSD developers
ni who
ni (according to the
Nikola Lečić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ni I'm curious to hear more about your ideas related to this partition of
ni full part: what USE_TEX actually does? Invokes parts of TeXLive
ni install scripts? For example, if I want to install Omega -- is it one
ni port or meta-port?
Bakul Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ba Why not add TeXLive port even as it is, so that people can
ba play with it? As for modularization, I hope you don't go the
ba extreme of a zillion little pieces but instead break it in a
ba few pieces to cover about 90% of the
It is because we cannot make a port of software that is not in
TeXLive. Some localized TeX variants use non-standard software and
sometimes it conflicts ones in TeXLive for example, so a TeXLive port
as it is does not work there (the current teTeX port and the related
ports work, btw).
Nikola Lečić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ni On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:02:45 +0900 (JST)
ni Hiroki Sato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ni
ni [...]
ni I realize it takes additional time, but considering pros and cons I
ni think it is better to do so.
ni
ni Sorry for interrupting the
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:02:45AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Do you think splitting it to small packages will be a big problem?
That many ports would create a significant impact on the build systems,
especially, sparc64, which is not keeping up at all as it is.
mcl
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:02:45AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Do you think splitting it to small packages will be a big problem?
That many ports would create a significant impact on the build systems,
especially, sparc64, which is not keeping up at all as it is.
mcl
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:24:41 -0600
Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:02:45AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Do you think splitting it to small packages will be a big problem?
That many ports would create a significant impact on
Le 14/12/2007 à 08:58:45+0100, Christian Walther a écrit
Hi,
On 14/12/2007, Nikola Le?i? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:24:09 +0100
Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just want known if there are any plan to replace teTeX ports (the
project as stop) by
Albert Shih wrote:
I'm just want known if there are any plan to replace teTeX ports (the
project as stop) by TeXLive ?
I've send long time ago a mail to teTeX maintainer and I don't have any
answer.
I known that's nothing urgent, but without tex the live is hard ;-)
Well, TeX itself is
On 20071214 09:49:24, Albert Shih wrote:
I think there are some misunderstanding. teTeX is a distrubition,
latex is a command.
tex, latex, pdftex, pdflatex, etc is set of command and all of this
command need many files (~15000 files).
If you like it's like a Linux, gcc is part of
Am Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:10:07 +0100
schrieb Michel Talon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Albert Shih wrote:
I'm just want known if there are any plan to replace teTeX ports
(the project as stop) by TeXLive ?
I've send long time ago a mail to teTeX maintainer and I don't have
any answer.
I
Le 15/12/2007 à 01:13:18+0100, Uwe Grohnwaldt a écrit
I think there are some changes which are very interresting. One of this
is unicode support through the xetex import to texlive.
It's one reason I send the mail.
Actually I already use ISO8859 becauseit's the default on FreeBSD. But
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:43:00
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Nikola Lečić wrote:
[...]
I must add that I tried two times to contact two FreeBSD developers
who
(according to the public sources) seemed to be interested in this;
never got a single word of reply.
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:24:09 +0100
Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just want known if there are any plan to replace teTeX ports (the
project as stop) by TeXLive ?
I've send long time ago a mail to teTeX maintainer and I don't have
any answer.
Me too.
I must add that I tried two
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Nikola Lečić wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:24:09 +0100
Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just want known if there are any plan to replace teTeX ports (the
project as stop) by TeXLive ?
I've send long time ago a mail to teTeX maintainer and I don't have
any answer.
Hi,
On 14/12/2007, Nikola Lečić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:24:09 +0100
Albert Shih [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just want known if there are any plan to replace teTeX ports (the
project as stop) by TeXLive ?
I've send long time ago a mail to teTeX maintainer and I
38 matches
Mail list logo
