Re: Update GnuTLS

Hello, On 09/01/2011 07:45 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: First of all, I'd prefer to wait some time and see what kind of problems gnutls users have with the new branch since it's quite new still, the first 3.0 release was just about one months ago. This table [1] may be of help to foresee probl

Re: Update GnuTLS

On 1 September 2011 11:51, Carmel wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:45:54 -0700 > Roman Bogorodskiy articulated: > >>   Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> >> > > GnuTLS has been updated. URL: >> > > >> > > >> > > I was wondering if there is a

Re: Update GnuTLS

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:45:54 -0700 Roman Bogorodskiy articulated: > Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > > > GnuTLS has been updated. URL: > > > > > > > > > I was wondering if there is any work being done on getting the new > > > version

Re: Update GnuTLS

Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > GnuTLS has been updated. URL: > > > > > > I was wondering if there is any work being done on getting the new > > version into the ports tree. GnuTLS 3.0.x branch replaces the GnuTLS > > 2.12.x branch a

Re: Update GnuTLS

Hi! > > gnutls-3.0.1 needs p11-kit in version 0.4 or newer, maybe that's why > > we're still at 2.x ? > > I am not even going to pretend to know what the problem is there. > Perhaps you can enlighten me as to why the "p11-kit" port cannot be > updated to the latest version. I can't enlighten you

Re: Update GnuTLS

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:28:43 +0200 Kurt Jaeger articulated: > > GnuTLS has been updated. URL: > > > > > > I was wondering if there is any work being done on getting the new > > version into the ports tree. GnuTLS 3.0.x branch

Re: Update GnuTLS

Hi! > GnuTLS has been updated. URL: > > > I was wondering if there is any work being done on getting the new > version into the ports tree. GnuTLS 3.0.x branch replaces the GnuTLS > 2.12.x branch as the supported stable branch