Re: compiling py-* ports for python32

2012-01-10 Thread Robert Huff
Matthew Pounsett writes: PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python3.2 As a casual user: what would be the pros and cons of doing this while the default is still 2.7? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing

Re: compiling py-* ports for python32

2012-01-10 Thread Chris Rees
On 10 January 2012 19:51, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote: Matthew Pounsett writes:   PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python3.2        As a casual user: what would be the pros and cons of doing this while the default is still 2.7? Another person to nag upstream to get up to date? Chris

Re: compiling py-* ports for python32

2012-01-10 Thread Eitan Adler
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote: Matthew Pounsett writes:   PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python3.2        As a casual user: what would be the pros and cons of doing this while the default is still 2.7? python32 is better as a language but... ... not eveyone

Re: compiling py-* ports for python32

2012-01-09 Thread wen heping
Try add this line in /etc/make.conf PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python3.2 wen 2012/1/10 Matthew Pounsett m...@conundrum.com I'd like to install a couple of the python module ports as part of my python32 install (also from ports). Is there an incantation I can use with portinstall or the ports

Re: compiling py-* ports for python32

2012-01-09 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On 2012/01/10, at 01:16, wen heping wrote: Try add this line in /etc/make.conf PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python3.2 Perfect! Thanks very much! One of the dependencies turns out to have a syntax dependency on python2.x, but I can work with that.