Re: devel/autotools267 and UPDATING

2010-09-16 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 16.09.2010 01:30, schrieb Barbara: I've just run portupgrade -ap, after getting the new autotools and reading UPDATING. From what I can understand, as it's not a version bump but a new port (I realized it too late...). So maybe I should have used something like: # portupgrade -o

Re: devel/autotools267 and UPDATING

2010-09-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 16/09/2010 11:43:04, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 16.09.2010 01:30, schrieb Barbara: I've just run portupgrade -ap, after getting the new autotools and reading UPDATING. From what I can understand, as it's not a version bump but a new port (I realized it too late...). So maybe I should

Re: devel/autotools267 and UPDATING

2010-09-15 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi, all-- On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Barbara wrote: About my previous mail, shouldn't the upgrade be handled by the entry in MOVED? Is it a portupgrade problem? Is the rebuild of ports like xmms or libX11 really necessary after a new version of autoconf? It looks like maybe a repocopy

Re: devel/autotools267 and UPDATING

2010-09-15 Thread Ade Lovett
On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Barbara wrote: About my previous mail, shouldn't the upgrade be handled by the entry in MOVED? Is it a portupgrade problem? Is the rebuild of ports like xmms or libX11 really necessary after a new version of autoconf? With sweeping ports such as autotools, the

Re: devel/autotools267 and UPDATING

2010-09-15 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi, Ade-- On Sep 15, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Ade Lovett wrote: On Sep 15, 2010, at 18:48 , Chuck Swiger wrote: It looks like maybe a repocopy is going on (or has gone wrong), since it is pointing to autoconf-2.62: You need to update your ports tree. Makefile is revision 1.77, not 1.75 as you