On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:54 PM, wrote:
> [Default] On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:53:27 -0500, Adam Vande More
> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:41 PM, wrote:
> >
> >> Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given that
On 1 September 2017 at 07:54, wrote:
> [Default] On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:53:27 -0500, Adam Vande More
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:41 PM, wrote:
>>
>>> Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given that all
>>>
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:54:09 -0400
wrote:
> [Default] On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:53:27 -0500, Adam Vande More
> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:41 PM, wrote:
> >
> >> Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given
> On 31 Aug, 2017, at 13:54,
> wrote:
>
> [Default] On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:53:27 -0500, Adam Vande More
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:41 PM, wrote:
>>
>>> Why wouldn't logs be in
[Default] On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:53:27 -0500, Adam Vande More
wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:41 PM, wrote:
>
>> Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given that all
>> other port "stuff" is under /usr/local, what advantage is there
>> in
> On 31 Aug, 2017, at 12:41, scratch65...@att.net wrote:
>
> Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given that all
> other port "stuff" is under /usr/local, what advantage is there
> in making logs an exception?
>
> [Default] On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:16:20 -0600, Adam Weinberger
>
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:41 PM, wrote:
> Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given that all
> other port "stuff" is under /usr/local, what advantage is there
> in making logs an exception?
>
Because logs shouldn't be under /usr.
man hier
--
Adam
Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given that all
other port "stuff" is under /usr/local, what advantage is there
in making logs an exception?
[Default] On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:16:20 -0600, Adam Weinberger
wrote:
>> On 31 Aug, 2017, at 9:07, Ernie Luzar
Le 31/08/2017 à 17:25, Ernie Luzar a écrit :
> Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>> On 31 Aug, 2017, at 9:07, Ernie Luzar wrote:
>>>
>>> Lets say I have a product that I want to port to Freebsd.
>>>
>>> Were is the standard location for the log file and PID file.
>>>
>>> Would it be in
31.08.2017 22:07, Ernie Luzar wrote:
> Lets say I have a product that I want to port to Freebsd.
>
> Were is the standard location for the log file and PID file.
>
> Would it be in
> /usr/local/etc/product/product.log
> /usr/local/etc/product/product.pid
>
> or
>
> /var/log/product.log
>
Adam Weinberger wrote:
On 31 Aug, 2017, at 9:07, Ernie Luzar wrote:
Lets say I have a product that I want to port to Freebsd.
Were is the standard location for the log file and PID file.
Would it be in
/usr/local/etc/product/product.log
/usr/local/etc/product/product.pid
Ernie Luzar wrote on 2017/08/31 17:07:
Lets say I have a product that I want to port to Freebsd.
Were is the standard location for the log file and PID file.
Would it be in
/usr/local/etc/product/product.log
/usr/local/etc/product/product.pid
or
/var/log/product.log
/var/run/product.pid
> On 31 Aug, 2017, at 9:07, Ernie Luzar wrote:
>
> Lets say I have a product that I want to port to Freebsd.
>
> Were is the standard location for the log file and PID file.
>
> Would it be in
> /usr/local/etc/product/product.log
> /usr/local/etc/product/product.pid
>
> or
13 matches
Mail list logo