From: Yasuhiro KIMURA
Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 01:48:16 +0900 (JST)
> From: Yasuhiro KIMURA
> Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
> Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 16:07:01 +0900 (JST)
&g
From: Yasuhiro KIMURA
Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 16:07:01 +0900 (JST)
> https://www.utahime.org/FreeBSD/ports/lang_ruby26.20190105.patch
>
> Please take following step to apply this patch.
>
> 1. cd /usr/ports
>
From: Yasuhiro KIMURA
Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 10:35:14 +0900 (JST)
> Thank you for reply. Then I'm going to create full port and post here
> again.
Created.
https://www.utahime.org/FreeBSD/ports/lang_ruby26.20190105.patch
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 5:27 PM Pete Wright wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/29/18 5:35 PM, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> > From: Adam Weinberger
> > Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
> > Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 15:34:17 -0700
> >
> >>
tire standard library, I'd at
> >>>> least strongly argue for including the most important gems (rake, gem,
> >>>> minitest, and bundler) by default. They are basic components of ruby
> >>>> itself, and ports should provide //optional// newer versions of them.
>
On 12/30/18 4:31 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 5:27 PM Pete Wright wrote:
On 12/29/18 5:35 PM, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
From: Adam Weinberger
Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 15:34:17 -0700
I think perhaps it's
On 12/29/18 5:35 PM, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
From: Adam Weinberger
Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 15:34:17 -0700
I think perhaps it's worth considering doing the opposite and,
beginning with 2.6, install the entire standard library
From: Adam Weinberger
Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 15:34:17 -0700
> I think perhaps it's worth considering doing the opposite and,
> beginning with 2.6, install the entire standard library by default.
> Gems and stdlib exist sid
On 12/29/18 2:34 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 6:20 AM Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
Hello all,
Ruby 2.6.0 is released and I tried porting it.
After creating start point by 'svn copy lang/ruby25 lang/ruby26', I
made following changes.
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 6:20 AM Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Ruby 2.6.0 is released and I tried porting it.
>
> After creating start point by 'svn copy lang/ruby25 lang/ruby26', I
> made following changes.
>
> https://www.utahime.org/FreeBSD/ports/lang_ruby26.patch
>
> It is build
Hello all,
Ruby 2.6.0 is released and I tried porting it.
After creating start point by 'svn copy lang/ruby25 lang/ruby26', I
made following changes.
https://www.utahime.org/FreeBSD/ports/lang_ruby26.patch
It is build successfully and works fine on 12.0-RELEASE amd64. But
there is still one
11 matches
Mail list logo