Today I tripped over another package that had broken dependencies even
thought It was supposedly a package that was from 9.2-RELEASE release
process. It was celestia, installed from 9.2-release packages, which
depended on libpangox.so.1. I tried to roll my own. The build was broken
too.
My
On 10/20/2013 8:42 PM, Jason C. Wells wrote:
Today I tripped over another package that had broken dependencies even
thought It was supposedly a package that was from 9.2-RELEASE release
process. It was celestia, installed from 9.2-release packages, which
depended on libpangox.so.1. I tried to
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Jason C. Wells j...@speakeasy.net wrote:
Is FreeBSD doing something new? I don't see an SVN tag for ports for the
9.2 release. Historically the ports tree was tagged and built a little
before -stable got tagged for release.
Thanks,
Jason
Portmgr may have
# Is FreeBSD doing something new? I don't see an SVN tag for ports for
# the 9.2 release. Historically the ports tree was tagged and built a
# little before -stable got tagged for release.
# Thanks,
# Jason
Ports don't belong to a specific FreeBSD version.
It's the built packages that are
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:38:36PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Jason C. Wells j...@speakeasy.net wrote:
Is FreeBSD doing something new? I don't see an SVN tag for ports for the
9.2 release. Historically the ports tree was tagged and built a little
before
On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 06:56:32 +
Thomas Mueller wrote:
# Is FreeBSD doing something new? I don't see an SVN tag for ports
for # the 9.2 release. Historically the ports tree was tagged and
built a # little before -stable got tagged for release.
# Thanks,
# Jason
Ports don't belong
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:14:42PM +0100, RW wrote:
On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 06:56:32 +
Thomas Mueller wrote:
# Is FreeBSD doing something new? I don't see an SVN tag for ports
for # the 9.2 release. Historically the ports tree was tagged and
built a # little before -stable got tagged
RELEASE_9_2_0 was tagged four hours ago. I hope there will be binaries
built from this tag.
I actually tried running the pre-tagged 9.2-release ports and ran into
some library dependency issues. I chalked it up to being premature on
the release and so I reverted to 9.1-release ports. I've
Is FreeBSD doing something new? I don't see an SVN tag for ports for
the 9.2 release. Historically the ports tree was tagged and built a
little before -stable got tagged for release.
Thanks,
Jason
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
