from Chris Rees:
What new features are you trying to take advantage of with png?
I went to the libpng website and couldn't find the desired changelog, but found
libpng 1.4.x and 1.5.x were still in active development, and there was also a
beta 1.7.0 . 1.6.2 is the latest release.
I notice
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Thomas Mueller
mueller6...@bellsouth.net wrote:
from Chris Rees:
What new features are you trying to take advantage of with png?
I went to the libpng website and couldn't find the desired changelog, but
found libpng 1.4.x and 1.5.x were still in active
from Dirk Meyer:
Hallo Thomas Mueller,
What is the status of graphics/png, now that FreeBSD 8.4_RC2 has been
released and the ports tree has been unfrozen?
Will it get the long overdue update to 1.6.x; how much regression testing
needs to be done?
1.6.1 ist still
On 26 Apr 2013 13:05, Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net wrote:
from Dirk Meyer:
Hallo Thomas Mueller,
What is the status of graphics/png, now that FreeBSD 8.4_RC2 has been
released and the ports tree has been unfrozen?
Will it get the long overdue update to 1.6.x; how much
What is the status of graphics/png?
I noticed NetBSD pkgsrc was prompt in updating to 1.6 (or was it 1.6.0?), even
though they are behind in some other packages.
I'm concerned with the prospect of having to rebuild all ports that depend on
png when 1.5.x - 1.6.
The status is that I wait
What is the status of graphics/png?
I noticed NetBSD pkgsrc was prompt in updating to 1.6 (or was it 1.6.0?), even
though they are behind in some other packages.
I'm concerned with the prospect of having to rebuild all ports that depend on
png when 1.5.x - 1.6.
Tom
On 02/22/13 12:22, Thomas Mueller wrote:
What is the status of graphics/png?
I noticed NetBSD pkgsrc was prompt in updating to 1.6 (or was it 1.6.0?), even
though they are behind in some other packages.
I'm concerned with the prospect of having to rebuild all ports that depend on png
when
