The Original VI ?

2013-09-04 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
this original vi, now with unicode support, had at least made it into the ports tree, but I can't seem to find it there. Am I wrong? Is it in there? If so, where please? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: The Original VI ?

2013-09-04 Thread olli hauer
currently support utf-8), but I sort-of thought that maybe this original vi, now with unicode support, had at least made it into the ports tree, but I can't seem to find it there. Am I wrong? Is it in there? If so, where please? try editors/nvi-devel

Re: The Original VI ?

2013-09-04 Thread Chad Perrin
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:38:08AM +0200, olli hauer wrote: On 2013-09-04 23:56, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Apparently, it is correct that FreeBSD distributes nvi as vi (and as far as I can tell, that _does not_ currently support utf-8), but I sort-of thought that maybe this original vi

Re: The Original VI ?

2013-09-04 Thread Zhihao Yuan
On Sep 4, 2013 3:55 PM, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net wrote: Is there some specific reason the nvi in base is stalled so far behind nvi-devel in terms of usability (by the way)? The nvi in CURRENT already supports UTF-8; if you want varies encodings, you need WITH_ICONV=1.