On Sun, 28 May 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> What do you guys think about the following patch for emulators/wine
> to help clarify this?
I now applied this to help clarify for others (just changing
lang/i386-wine to emulators/i386-wine - too much lang/gcc* work
recently ;-).
Gerald
On Mon, 15 May 2017, David Naylor wrote:
>> I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for
>> amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation.
> - On an i386 environment with 32-bit Windows binaries use lang/wine.
> - On an amd64 environment with 32-bit Windows
On Sunday, 14 May 2017 23:23:05 Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for
> amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation.
- On an i386 environment with 32-bit Windows binaries use lang/wine.
- On an amd64 environment with 32-bit
I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for
amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation.
from David Naylor:
> On Saturday, 13 May 2017 08:16:55 Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for
> > amd64 and
Hi
On Saturday, 13 May 2017 08:16:55 Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for
> amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation.
>
> I don't really want i386-wine as such, since I would install wine on i386
> and could then mount this
I see several different wine ports and would like to know which I need for
amd64 and which I need for an i386 installation.
I don't really want i386-wine as such, since I would install wine on i386 and
could then mount this partition at /compat/i386 to run from amd64, while
retaining the
