Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

2009-04-27 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 26.04.2009, 19:39 Uhr, schrieb Renato Botelho rbga...@gmail.com: On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? You can change gecko engine with

Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

2009-04-26 Thread Yuri
I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send

Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

2009-04-26 Thread Robert Huff
Yuri writes: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? This is a question you should ask of those who write the programs, who in general have no direct connection with FreeBSD.

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

2009-04-26 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Yuri y...@rawbw.com writes: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. I don't see that at all. What makes you say that? None of those programs seem to have firefox on their dependency lists in the ports system, and I don't remember using a browser

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

2009-04-26 Thread Yuri
Lowell Gilbert wrote: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. I don't see that at all. What makes you say that? None of those programs seem to have firefox on their dependency lists in the ports system, and I don't remember using a browser

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

2009-04-26 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:37:13 -0500, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: Lowell Gilbert wrote: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. I don't see that at all. What makes you say that? None of those programs seem to have firefox on their dependency lists

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

2009-04-26 Thread Renato Botelho
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? You can change gecko engine with WITH_GECKO, if you want to use libxul, the one firefox3 uses, just use:

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

2009-04-26 Thread army.of.root
Renato Botelho wrote: On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? You can change gecko engine with WITH_GECKO, if you want to use libxul, the one

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

2009-04-26 Thread David E. Thiel
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 02:09:30AM -0700, Yuri wrote: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? A related question is why www/firefox is still Firefox 2, and all the browser plugins like swfdec only work with

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

2009-04-26 Thread Koop Mast
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 20:43 +0200, army.of.root wrote: Renato Botelho wrote: On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? You can change gecko

Re: Why so many ports still depend on firefox-2.X.X.X ?

2009-04-26 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa
Am Sonntag, den 26.04.2009, 20:43 +0200 schrieb army.of.root: Renato Botelho wrote: On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: I see that ImageMagick, gimp, gimp-apps, inkscape, gnucash, etc depend on firefox-2. Why they aren't switched to firefox-3? You can change