Nikola Lečić nikola.le...@anthesphoria.net writes:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:14:21 +0100
marek...@gmail.com wrote:
Kurt Jaeger p...@opsec.eu writes:
Hi!
If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that
Biber is missing from one of the texlive packages?
Probably, yes.
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 22:52:05 +0200
marek...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that it's necessary to match the versions of biblatex and
biber. With the up-to-date packages (biblatex v2.8a), I had to
install biber v1.8 and not the newest one.
That's correct, biblatex and biber versions are strictly
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:14:21 +0100
marek...@gmail.com wrote:
Kurt Jaeger p...@opsec.eu writes:
Hi!
If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that
Biber is missing from one of the texlive packages?
Probably, yes.
Or should it get a port on its own?
There's
Kurt Jaeger p...@opsec.eu writes:
Hi!
If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that Biber is
missing from one of the texlive packages?
Probably, yes.
Or should it get a port on its own?
There's an old (2012) discussion at
Hi,
I was trying to use Biber (BibTeX replacement for users of biblatex,
with full Unicode support), but I was unable to find it.
I was wandering, why is it not present in one of the texlive packages?
Or is it hidden somewhere and I'm not able to find it?
I have those packages installed:
Hi!
There are several ports related to bibtex:
Clearly, that was too much:
grep ^bib INDEX-10 | tr '|' ' ' | while read p pp j; doecho $p $pp; done
So:
bibtexconv-1.0.0 /usr/ports/converters/bibtexconv
bibcursed-2.0.1 /usr/ports/print/bibcursed
biblio-py-0.6.1 /usr/ports/print/biblio-py
Hi!
I was trying to use Biber (BibTeX replacement for users of biblatex,
with full Unicode support), but I was unable to find it.
I was wandering, why is it not present in one of the texlive packages?
Or is it hidden somewhere and I'm not able to find it?
There are several ports related to
Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu writes:
Hi!
There are several ports related to bibtex:
Clearly, that was too much:
grep ^bib INDEX-10 | tr '|' ' ' | while read p pp j; doecho $p $pp; done
So:
bibtexconv-1.0.0 /usr/ports/converters/bibtexconv
bibcursed-2.0.1 /usr/ports/print/bibcursed
Hi!
If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that Biber is
missing from one of the texlive packages?
Probably, yes.
Or should it get a port on its own?
There's an old (2012) discussion at
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-May/075180.html
which
On 1/11/15 3:39 AM, Marek Rudnicki wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to use Biber (BibTeX replacement for users of biblatex,
with full Unicode support), but I was unable to find it.
I was wandering, why is it not present in one of the texlive packages?
Or is it hidden somewhere and I'm not able to find
10 matches
Mail list logo
