On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 06:35:46PM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> > +--On 29 juin 2016 13:15:44 +0200 Michelle Sullivan
> > wrote:
> > | Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > |> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:15:56PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > |>>
> > |>> And I do think we sh
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 29 juin 2016 13:15:44 +0200 Michelle Sullivan
wrote:
| Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
|> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:15:56PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
|>>
|>> And I do think we should, opposite to what you are proposing, make the
|>> committer spend extra time for high-
+--On 29 juin 2016 13:15:44 +0200 Michelle Sullivan
wrote:
| Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
|> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:15:56PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
|>>
|>> And I do think we should, opposite to what you are proposing, make the
|>> committer spend extra time for high-profile ports that enta
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:15:56PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
And I do think we should, opposite to what you are proposing, make the
committer spend extra time for high-profile ports that entail sweeping
changes to chase down the breaking change to, say, a library p
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:15:56PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 28.06.2016 um 11:17 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
>
> > What you are asking is part of the blanket in particular when changing
> > things in
> > individual ports, we expect committers to have a look at pending PR (yes I
> > know
Am 28.06.2016 um 11:17 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
> What you are asking is part of the blanket in particular when changing things
> in
> individual ports, we expect committers to have a look at pending PR (yes I
> know
> I have been guilty of individual port change without sometime checking abo
Am 27.06.2016 um 18:07 schrieb Cy Schubert:
> Mathias,
Cy,
Mind the double t please.
> I'm surprised at your position. I recall a commit you made to one of my
> ports a few years ago, to which I objected. Your position now is a complete
> reversal of your arguments then.
Quite possible. Thi
Am 27.06.2016 um 12:02 schrieb Guido Falsi:
>> 2. What I was meaning to state was that (and I'll not pick at the
>> kind soul who has modernized the port) we should only apply the
>> blanket approval if ports have fallen into disrepair.
>
> I'd say that it's a matter of urgency for the change. Ne
On 28/06/2016 9:03 PM, Alphons van Werven wrote:
> Maintainers are already notified by e-mail of commits resulting from PRs
> because they are put on the CC list. Maybe it's just me, but I think it
> would be very nice if maintainers were *always* automagically notified of
> *any* commits to their
Kevin Golding wrote:
> and about the same time someone did a blanket update of RUN_DEPENDS in
> my ports. Including a PORTREVISION bump. It's easy to argue that's a
> very trivial change that doesn't needs maintainer involvement, but it
> also impacted my day.
[snip]
> Had I known about the blanke
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:12:46AM +0100, Kevin Golding wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 21:21:31 +0100, Cy Schubert
> wrote:
>
> > In message <57716d89.1050...@sorbs.net>, Michelle Sullivan writes:
>
> > > Don't forget that many people see their name/email in the maintainer
> > > line as being resp
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 21:21:31 +0100, Cy Schubert
wrote:
In message <57716d89.1050...@sorbs.net>, Michelle Sullivan writes:
Don't forget that many people see their name/email in the maintainer
line as being responsible for the port.. so someone goes makes blanket
changes which actually break
In message <57716d89.1050...@sorbs.net>, Michelle Sullivan writes:
> Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> >
> > All: How did you feel the first time you saw your email on a maintainer
> > line? That is priceless and shouldn't be confused with the 'bad' kind of
> > ownership.
> >
>
> Don't forget that many peopl
Kubilay Kocak wrote:
All: How did you feel the first time you saw your email on a maintainer
line? That is priceless and shouldn't be confused with the 'bad' kind of
ownership.
Don't forget that many people see their name/email in the maintainer
line as being responsible for the port.. so so
In message <5770eed4.1070...@tu-dortmund.de>, Matthias Andree writes:
> [Sorry for this re-send, I feel we need to re-send thisto ports@ so the
> discussion goes to a public and archived list.]
>
> Am 27.06.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Mathieu Arnold:
> >
> >
> > +--On 27 juin 2016 16:10:36 +0800 Marce
> On 27 Jun, 2016, at 9:22, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>
> On 28/06/2016 12:25 AM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>> On 27 Jun, 2016, at 3:27, Marcelo Araujo
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-06-27 16:58 GMT+08:00 Matthias Andree
>>> : Am 27.06.2016 um 10:16 schrieb
>>> Mathieu Arnold:
+--O
On 28/06/2016 12:25 AM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>> On 27 Jun, 2016, at 3:27, Marcelo Araujo
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-06-27 16:58 GMT+08:00 Matthias Andree
>> : Am 27.06.2016 um 10:16 schrieb
>> Mathieu Arnold:
>>>
>>>
>>> +--On 27 juin 2016 16:10:36 +0800 Marcelo Araujo
>>> wrote: | 2016-06
Hi!
[adamw]
> Maintainership too often means that change requests get ignored
> for two weeks before they're committed.
That is the case sometimes, yes.
But oftern maintainership provides identification with the project
and proud of achievement etc, which causes people to invest time
and skills
> On 27 Jun, 2016, at 3:27, Marcelo Araujo wrote:
>
>
>
> 2016-06-27 16:58 GMT+08:00 Matthias Andree :
> Am 27.06.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Mathieu Arnold:
> >
> >
> > +--On 27 juin 2016 16:10:36 +0800 Marcelo Araujo
> > wrote:
> > | 2016-06-27 16:02 GMT+08:00 Mathieu Arnold :
> > |> | Read here f
On 06/27/16 11:16, Matthias Andree wrote:
> [Sorry for this re-send, I feel we need to re-send thisto ports@ so the
> discussion goes to a public and archived list.]
>
> Am 27.06.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Mathieu Arnold:
>>
>>
>> +--On 27 juin 2016 16:10:36 +0800 Marcelo Araujo
>> wrote:
>> | 2016-06
2016-06-27 16:58 GMT+08:00 Matthias Andree :
> Am 27.06.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Mathieu Arnold:
> >
> >
> > +--On 27 juin 2016 16:10:36 +0800 Marcelo Araujo <
> araujobsdp...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > | 2016-06-27 16:02 GMT+08:00 Mathieu Arnold :
> > |> | Read here for reference:
> > |> |
> > |>
> h
[Sorry for this re-send, I feel we need to re-send thisto ports@ so the
discussion goes to a public and archived list.]
Am 27.06.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Mathieu Arnold:
>
>
> +--On 27 juin 2016 16:10:36 +0800 Marcelo Araujo
> wrote:
> | 2016-06-27 16:02 GMT+08:00 Mathieu Arnold :
> |> | Read here
22 matches
Mail list logo
