On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:47:11PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
When I asked you what was necessary to test this, you said all that was
necessary was to define _PERL_REFACTORING_COMPLETE.
And my memory slipped.
The explanation, however, was correct: the
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:47:11PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> When I asked you what was necessary to test this, you said all that was
> necessary was to define _PERL_REFACTORING_COMPLETE.
And my memory slipped.
The explanation, however, was correct: the problem is that if you
unconditionally i
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Mark Linimon wrote:
These are the results that I get on my home machine:
--
Here is my /etc/make.conf:
OPENSSH_OVERWRITE_BASE=yes
WITH_APACHE2=yes
X11BASE=${LOCALBASE}
USE_LOCAL_MK= yes
Thi
Its a bit to late for me to think about this tonight, but on quick
glance our diffs not equivalent.
On 7/29/2010 12:14 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> These are the results that I get on my home machine:
>
> $ make index
> Generating INDEX-7 - please wait..make_index: thunderbird-3.0.5_1: no entry
These are the results that I get on my home machine:
$ make index
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait..make_index: thunderbird-3.0.5_1: no entry for
:/home/pcvs/ports/lang
make_index: thunderbird-3.0.5_1: no entry for :/home/pcvs/ports/lang
make_index: thunderbird-3.0.5_1: no entry for :/home/pcvs/p
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
On 07/20/10 04:52, Doug Barton wrote:
So yeah, a pointyhat run is almost certainly a good idea before actually
making the change, however 'make index' was the canary in Mark's
original coal mine, and fortunately that bird is still singing. :)
Exc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/20/10 04:52, Doug Barton wrote:
> So yeah, a pointyhat run is almost certainly a good idea before actually
> making the change, however 'make index' was the canary in Mark's
> original coal mine, and fortunately that bird is still singing. :)
Exc
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
You didn't quite test everything.
I didn't try. :) In talking to Mark his previous testing clearly
demonstrated that with the knob set would cause the INDEX generation to
fail spectacularly. So the fact that this did not happen, seems like a
g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/20/10 03:57, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>
>> I've long been interested in this. I must be using the wrong options or
>> something. About 1 yr ago I was able to build the index after removing
>> the appr
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
I've long been interested in this. I must be using the wrong options or
something. About 1 yr ago I was able to build the index after removing
the appropriate things in Mk/.
Well, seems like I have good news. :) I ran tests on both 9-current an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've long been interested in this. I must be using the wrong options or
something. About 1 yr ago I was able to build the index after removing
the appropriate things in Mk/.
On 07/19/10 02:12, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/18/10 15:38, Mark Linimon w
On 07/18/10 15:38, Mark Linimon wrote:
> The intention of bsd.perl.mk was to eventually allow a bunch of code
> to be pulled out of bsd.port.mk, and to have bsd.perl.mk only included
> conditionally, on the theory that it will speed up INDEX building
> somewhat. (I have not tested for speedup).
S
12 matches
Mail list logo