Re: Add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk

Just created a review[1] for the USE_GITLAB feature. If you would like to test or provide feedback with another feature or perhaps something that could have been done better it would be great to get feedback! Best regards Richard Gallamore [1] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12162

Re: Add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk

, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > > > On 21.08.2017 16:48, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> Le 20/08/2017 à 23:16, Derek Schrock a écrit : >>> On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 04:28:01PM EDT, L.Bartoletti wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I would suggest to ad

Re: Add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk

On 21.08.2017 16:48, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 20/08/2017 à 23:16, Derek Schrock a écrit : On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 04:28:01PM EDT, L.Bartoletti wrote: Hello, I would suggest to add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk Since, I think I am not competent to propose a patch, I ask for help. I have

Re: Add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk

Le 20/08/2017 à 23:16, Derek Schrock a écrit : > On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 04:28:01PM EDT, L.Bartoletti wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would suggest to add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk >> >> Since, I think I am not competent to propose a patch, I ask for help. &

Re: Add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk

On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 04:28:01PM EDT, L.Bartoletti wrote: > Hello, > > I would suggest to add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk > > Since, I think I am not competent to propose a patch, I ask for help. > > I have ports to create where the sources are only available on GitLa

Add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk

Hello, I would suggest to add gitlab.com into bsd.sites.mk Since, I think I am not competent to propose a patch, I ask for help. I have ports to create where the sources are only available on GitLab. Like some other ports (audio/midi-matrix-lv2, audio/moony-lv2, etc.) I can fetch source

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

n 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:13, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan >>>>>>> Beich) wrote: >>>>>>>> Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

t;>>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan >>>>>> Beich) wrote: >>>>>>> Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> writes: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer >

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

>>>> Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> writes: >>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer >>>>>>> <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> As some of you may have seen, I have d

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer >>>> <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: >>>>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >>>>> bsd.sites.mk recently. >>>>> >>>>> One question I ran int

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer >>>>>> <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: >>>>>>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >>>>>>> bsd.sites.mk recently. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> O

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan >>> Beich) wrote: >>>> Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> writes: >>>>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer >>>>> <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: >>>>>&

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

@freebsd.org> writes: >>>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer >>>> <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: >>>>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >>>>> bsd.sites.mk recently. >>>>> &

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

>>> <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: >>>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >>>> bsd.sites.mk recently. >>>> >>>> One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, >>>> which of the two do we prefer? (Or

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:45, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, Jan Beich wrote: >>> https first for people that run 'make makesum'. >> It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. >> >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 > > With that, isn't https

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, Jan Beich wrote: >> https first for people that run 'make makesum'. > It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 With that, isn't https pretty pointless? I guess I'll leave things as are, then, for that mirror that offers

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

ifer >>> <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: >>>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >>>> bsd.sites.mk recently. >>>> >>>> One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, >>>> which o

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) wrote: > Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> writes: >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> >> wrote: >>> As some of you may have seen, I have do

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> writes: > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> > wrote: > >> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >> bsd.sites.mk recently. >> >> One question I ra

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: > As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on > bsd.sites.mk recently. > > One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, > which of the two do we prefer? (

bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on bsd.sites.mk recently. One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list both?) Gerald @FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-ports

Mk/bsd.sites.mk add NetBSD path to fix dns/dlint/Makefile fetch BROKEN

Hi ports-...@freebsd.org cc: po...@freebsd.org I suggest ports-mgr@ add a distfiles repository path to Mk/bsd.sites.mk which would allow dns/lint [& perhaps other ports ?] to remove BROKEN= *** current/ports/dns/dlint/MakefileMon Dec 14 12:45:45 2015 --- current/ports/dns/dlint/Make

Re: Mk/bsd.sites.mk add NetBSD path to fix dns/dlint/Makefile fetch BROKEN

On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 13:15:02 +0100 "Julian H. Stacey" <j...@berklix.com> wrote > Hi ports-...@freebsd.org > cc: po...@freebsd.org > > I suggest ports-mgr@ add a distfiles repository path to Mk/bsd.sites.mk > which would allow dns/lint [& perhaps other ports ?]

Mk/bsd.sites.mk add NetBSD path to fix dns/dlint/Makefile fetch BROKEN (fwd)

Repost with ports-mgr@ typo fixed to portsmgr@ Hi ports...@freebsd.org cc: po...@freebsd.org I suggest portsmgr@ add a distfiles repository path to Mk/bsd.sites.mk which would allow dns/lint [& perhaps other ports ?] to remove BROKEN= *** current/ports/dns/dlint/MakefileMon Dec 14 12:4

[Bug 199447] Mk/bsd.sites.mk re-introduce WORKING MASTER_SITE_COMP_SOURCES list

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199447 Kubilay Kocak ko...@freebsd.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easy, patch,

[Bug 199447] Mk/bsd.sites.mk re-introduce WORKING MASTER_SITE_COMP_SOURCES list

@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #3 from Mathieu Arnold m...@freebsd.org --- bsd.sites.mk is not owned by portmgr, anyone can commit to it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk

their mirror in the master list. You will see my recent commit to bsd.sites.mk, I added 4 more volunteers to the Debian list, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.sites.mk.diff?r1=1.558;r2=1.559 I hope this helps clarify the usage of other project mirrors. Thomas -- Thomas Abthorpe

Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk

Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:09:10PM +, Chris Rees wrote: I worry about the ethics of 'stealing' Fedora's bandwidth with other people's ports; we should only be using their mirrors if it's explicitly developed by Fedora. Correct. dougb has

Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:41:21AM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Isn't this concern orthogonal to the original one about maintaining a (set of) correct MASTER_SITE setting(s), for use by such ports as can legitimately use Fedora/Debian/NetBSD/whatever sites? Yes, IMHO. mcl

Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk

On 17 Jan 2012 08:32, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Jason Helfman j...@freebsd.org wrote: I was looking at update bsd.sites.mk, and found that MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX is only used in one port. Any objection to moving this site-index into x11-themes/bluecurve-themes, and removing from

Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk

--On January 18, 2012 9:09:10 PM + Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote: I worry about the ethics of 'stealing' Fedora's bandwidth with other people's ports; we should only be using their mirrors if it's explicitly developed by Fedora. I'm not sure I follow. If Fedora is making an rpm

Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:09:10PM +, Chris Rees wrote: I worry about the ethics of 'stealing' Fedora's bandwidth with other people's ports; we should only be using their mirrors if it's explicitly developed by Fedora. Correct. dougb has pointed this out before and no one has taken the

Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk

Jason Helfman j...@freebsd.org wrote: I was looking at update bsd.sites.mk, and found that MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX is only used in one port. Any objection to moving this site-index into x11-themes/bluecurve-themes, and removing from bsd.sites.mk? There is also a referrence

Rubygem hosting (bsd.sites.mk)

to time the general migration of gems from rubyforge.org to gemcutter.org/rubygems.org [2] (and indeed GitHub[3]) has been mentioned on the FreeBSD ruby and ports lists, but it would appear nothing has been changed yet in the bsd.sites.mk file to accommodate this migration (may have missed a pr

Re: bsd.sites.mk

John J. Rushford Jr wrote: Greetings, I was wondering if you could move ftp.belnet.be to the bottom of all lists in bsd.sites.mk. This ftp site is extremely slow and shouldn't be at the top of the list in my opinion. Fast is a relative term for people. Take a look at /usr/ports/ports-mgmt

bsd.sites.mk

Greetings, I was wondering if you could move ftp.belnet.be to the bottom of all lists in bsd.sites.mk. This ftp site is extremely slow and shouldn't be at the top of the list in my opinion. thanks John Rushford j...@alisa.org ___ freebsd-ports

Re: bsd.sites.mk

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:11:42 -0700 John J. Rushford Jr j...@alisa.org wrote: Greetings, I was wondering if you could move ftp.belnet.be to the bottom of all lists in bsd.sites.mk. This ftp site is extremely slow and shouldn't be at the top of the list in my opinion. Try setting your

bsd.sites.mk changes (was Re: Xfce goodies master sites)

The questions: is this the right thing to do and is it the right way to go about it? If bsd.sites.mk is changed as shown below, all of the xfce goodies ports can use MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_XFCE_GOODIES} That will unify all of the goodies ports and ease future changes like

Re: RFC: bsd.sites.mk - introduce some magic

On 7/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch introduces a very simple, but handy (imho) framework into bsd.sites.mk: http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/bsd.sites.macros.diff I added some more default subdirs: http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/bsd.sites.macros2.diff

RFC: bsd.sites.mk - introduce some magic

This patch introduces a very simple, but handy (imho) framework into bsd.sites.mk: http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/bsd.sites.macros.diff 1. (A tad) cleaner ports Makefiles: Write MASTER_SITES=FOOBAR instead of MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_FOOBAR} and get away with it 2. Abbreviations Write

Re: RFC: bsd.sites.mk - introduce some magic

On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:18 +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: This patch introduces a very simple, but handy (imho) framework into bsd.sites.mk: http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/bsd.sites.macros.diff 1. (A tad) cleaner ports Makefiles: Write MASTER_SITES=FOOBAR instead of MASTER_SITES

Re: RFC: bsd.sites.mk - introduce some magic

On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:37:37PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote: On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:18 +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: 1. (A tad) cleaner ports Makefiles: Write MASTER_SITES=FOOBAR instead of MASTER_SITES=${MASTER_SITE_FOOBAR} and get away with it 2. Abbreviations Write

Re: RFC: bsd.sites.mk - introduce some magic

On 7/26/06, Shaun Amott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:37:37PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote: On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:18 +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: 2. Abbreviations Write MASTER_SITES=SF and mean SOURCEFORGE I don't quite like having 3 different ways to use a