Re: buzilla 214400: is is ports/head/base/binutils that is being reported on, freebsd-powe...@freebsd.org assignee is wrong

2017-03-07 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:31:34PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > May I ask what exactly makes you think that freebsd-ports-b...@freebsd.org > is correct assignee in this case? I'm away from my systems right now but I do know that this problem also affects sparc64. The original assignments of t

Re: buzilla 214400: is is ports/head/base/binutils that is being reported on, freebsd-powe...@freebsd.org assignee is wrong

2017-03-07 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 08:19:20AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > But I can not fix the assignee: it should not be freebsd-powe...@freebsd.org > > Can you put back the correct assignee for a port problem? May I ask what exactly makes you think that freebsd-ports-b...@freebsd.org is correct assignee

buzilla 214400: is is ports/head/base/binutils that is being reported on, freebsd-powe...@freebsd.org assignee is wrong

2017-03-07 Thread Mark Millard
You (danfe at FreeBSD.org) updated bugzilla 214400 but. . . The notation base/binutils in the summary and possibly elsewhere seems to have confused things: This is about the port, not the base system files. So I've added ports/head/ before base/binutils in the Summary. I've also put back the por