Hi!
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 11:57:10 -0500
> Ash Gokhale wrote:
>
> > I've canned a version of the port that works for me(tm), and gone
> > over the recent commit history for obviously
> > untoward behaviour.
> > https://github.com/agokhale/freebsd-ports-cad-gerbv
> >
>
> Hi Ash.
> I've tested
On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 11:57:10 -0500
Ash Gokhale wrote:
> I've canned a version of the port that works for me(tm), and gone
> over the recent commit history for obviously
> untoward behaviour.
> https://github.com/agokhale/freebsd-ports-cad-gerbv
>
Hi Ash.
I've tested the port and it works just
This is the possible culprit from their git per Tim's analysis, I'm
unable to check a specimen of the distfile with the incorrect signature as
it is unavailable and the original was not built from the
gerbv-2-7-RELEASE tag.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 6:13 AM Tim Rice wrote:
> How about checking the git log and doing a git diff.
> git clone git://git.geda-project.org/gerbv.git
>
> Looks like README-cvs.txt was pulled and README-git.txt added.
That should also work. Ash, Could you also check these?
Thanks,
Li-Wen
On 12/27/19 13:32, Ash Gokhale wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 11:54 AM Ash Gokhale wrote:
>
>> I can't locate the original distfile- is there a way to get it?
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 11:47 AM Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>>
>>>
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 11:54 AM Ash Gokhale wrote:
> I can't locate the original distfile- is there a way to get it?
>
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 11:47 AM Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>
>>
>>
I can't locate the original distfile- is there a way to get it?
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 11:47 AM Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>
> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/commit/15fb0f93157b9f316271505a26de261cca8c8f97#diff-e950be35b121285d100ab42864142525
>
> We did update the hashes while updating to
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/commit/15fb0f93157b9f316271505a26de261cca8c8f97#diff-e950be35b121285d100ab42864142525
We did update the hashes while updating to 2.7.0.
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/507372 is bumping
PORTREVISION and it doesn't related to distfile. The issue
Seems that upstream didn't change anything. This shows that we bumped the
version/ without fixing the hashes. So this unfetchable is self inflicted.
This broke the port, and likely never built for anyone.
Also did cad/gerbv just get deleted in current after the expiration
timer, that's
I got it to build on 12.1 by dropping the broken,deprecated from the
Makefile and updating distinfo to the following.
Seems that the upstream made changes without bumping the rev number.
SHA256 (gerbv-2.7.0.tar.gz) =
c5ee808c4230ce6be3ad10ab63c547098386d43022704de25ddb9378e62053b4
SIZE
10 matches
Mail list logo