Dominic Fandrey wrote:
But that's not different for any port. E.g. sysutils/bsdadminscripts is
all mine, I create the distfiles and maintain the port, their is no
guarantee that I don't do evil apart from me being quite certain that
I don't.
Mark already pointed out that maintainers and
Doug Barton wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
But that's not different for any port. E.g. sysutils/bsdadminscripts is
all mine, I create the distfiles and maintain the port, their is no
guarantee that I don't do evil apart from me being quite certain that
I don't.
Mark already pointed out that
b. f. wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 02:50:31PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
So when I submitted ioquake3-1.36 I condemned some poor committer
to read 366609 lines of code?
We expect them to test-install the initial code to make sure it's
not malware.
We expect them to scan the diffs to
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 04:02:31PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
I don't see the wiggle room for anything spontaneously changing when
properly checksummed distfiles are involved.
Alright, then I misread it.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
But this is not the case we're talking about (I explained the process
in sufficient detail, I think). I take an up to date snapshot, apply my
patch set, make a couple of test builds and runs, update the patch set
until everything works as expected. Than I wrap the whole
Doug Barton wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
But this is not the case we're talking about (I explained the process
in sufficient detail, I think). I take an up to date snapshot, apply my
patch set, make a couple of test builds and runs, update the patch set
until everything works as expected.
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 04:48:43PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
A committer explained to me that he doesn't want to deal with SVN
snapshot based ports. Is that a common attitude and what should
I do to remedy this?
Well, the problem is that we (FreeBSD) can't guarantee
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:31:38PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
But that's not different for any port. E.g. sysutils/bsdadminscripts is
all mine, I create the distfiles and maintain the port, their is no
guarantee that I don't do evil apart from me being quite certain that
I don't.
Sure
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:31:38PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
But that's not different for any port. E.g. sysutils/bsdadminscripts is
all mine, I create the distfiles and maintain the port, their is no
guarantee that I don't do evil apart from me being quite certain that
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 01:43:20PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Are committers really supposed to read the code?
Yes.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 01:43:20PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Are committers really supposed to read the code?
Yes.
So when I submitted ioquake3-1.36 I condemned some poor committer
to read 366609 lines of code?
___
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 02:50:31PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
So when I submitted ioquake3-1.36 I condemned some poor committer
to read 366609 lines of code?
We expect them to test-install the initial code to make sure it's
not malware.
We expect them to scan the diffs to make sure the
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 02:50:31PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
So when I submitted ioquake3-1.36 I condemned some poor committer
to read 366609 lines of code?
We expect them to test-install the initial code to make sure it's
not malware.
We expect them to scan the diffs to make sure the
Hello,
I'm maintaining games/ioquake3 and games/ioquake3-devel and I'd
like to support more platforms than i386 and amd64.
If anyone would like to support me, please apply the patch from
ports/141453:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=141453
Remove the ONLY_FOR_ARCHS line in
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 04:48:43PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
A committer explained to me that he doesn't want to deal with SVN
snapshot based ports. Is that a common attitude and what should
I do to remedy this?
Well, the problem is that we (FreeBSD) can't guarantee whether the
contents of
15 matches
Mail list logo
