Re: is bsd.database.mk out of sync with Uses/pgsql.mk?

2014-10-11 Thread Chris Rees
On 28 September 2014 11:36:41 BST, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 03:52:56PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: Today I encountered these build messages with poudriere: Invalid PGSQL default version 92; valid versions are 8.4 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 These messages

Re: is bsd.database.mk out of sync with Uses/pgsql.mk?

2014-10-11 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 08:45:51AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: On 28 September 2014 11:36:41 BST, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 03:52:56PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: Today I encountered these build messages with poudriere: Invalid PGSQL default

Re: is bsd.database.mk out of sync with Uses/pgsql.mk?

2014-09-28 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 03:52:56PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: Today I encountered these build messages with poudriere: Invalid PGSQL default version 92; valid versions are 8.4 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 These messages originate in Mk/Uses/pgsql.mk But Mk/bsd.database.mk claims a different

is bsd.database.mk out of sync with Uses/pgsql.mk?

2014-09-27 Thread Dan Langille
Today I encountered these build messages with poudriere: Invalid PGSQL default version 92; valid versions are 8.4 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 These messages originate in Mk/Uses/pgsql.mk But Mk/bsd.database.mk claims a different format is correct: # DEFAULT_PGSQL_VER # -

Re: is bsd.database.mk out of sync with Uses/pgsql.mk?

2014-09-27 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote: Today I encountered these build messages with poudriere: Invalid PGSQL default version 92; valid versions are 8.4 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 These messages originate in Mk/Uses/pgsql.mk But Mk/bsd.database.mk claims a different