Re: libreoffice, Makefile fix proposal...

2012-06-10 Thread Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.
- Original Message - 2012/6/7 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi lenzi.ser...@gmail.com: Well, now that libreoffice build is solved, than  what about insert a line: CONFLICTS_BUILD=    boost* near line 63 of Makefile??? libreoffice does not conflict with boost; just Makefile has a

Re: libreoffice, Makefile fix proposal...

2012-06-09 Thread Chris Rees
On 7 June 2012 15:28, Hiroto Kagotani hiroto.kagot...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/6/7 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi lenzi.ser...@gmail.com: Well, now that libreoffice build is solved, than  what about insert a line: CONFLICTS_BUILD=    boost* near line 63 of Makefile??? libreoffice does not conflict

Re: libreoffice, Makefile fix proposal...

2012-06-09 Thread Mel Flynn
On 9-6-2012 9:42, Chris Rees wrote: On 7 June 2012 15:28, Hiroto Kagotani hiroto.kagot...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/6/7 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi lenzi.ser...@gmail.com: Well, now that libreoffice build is solved, than what about insert a line: CONFLICTS_BUILD=boost* near line 63 of

Re: libreoffice, Makefile fix proposal...

2012-06-07 Thread Olivier Smedts
Hi, 2012/6/7 Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com: # portmaster -g boost-libs boost-jam # pkg_delete -f boost-libs-\* boost-jam-\* # cd /usr/ports/editor/libreoffice # make patch # cd work/libreoffice-core --- lotuswordpro/Module_lotuswordpro.mk.orig    2012-05-31 19:34:52.014043605 -0300 +++

Re: libreoffice, Makefile fix proposal...

2012-06-07 Thread Robert Huff
Olivier Smedts writes: This way it loses dependency tracking (ie. /var/db/pkg/boost-libs-*/+REQUIRED_BY). Don't forget to portmaster --check-depends after the pkg_add. Am I the only one who thinks the make process should not depend on tools like portmaster?

Re: libreoffice, Makefile fix proposal...

2012-06-07 Thread Jerry
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 07:38:36 -0400 Robert Huff articulated: Olivier Smedts writes: This way it loses dependency tracking (ie. /var/db/pkg/boost-libs-*/+REQUIRED_BY). Don't forget to portmaster --check-depends after the pkg_add. Am I the only one who thinks the make process should

Re: libreoffice, Makefile fix proposal...

2012-06-07 Thread Hiroto Kagotani
2012/6/7 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi lenzi.ser...@gmail.com: Well, now that libreoffice build is solved, than  what about insert a line: CONFLICTS_BUILD=    boost* near line 63 of Makefile??? libreoffice does not conflict with boost; just Makefile has a problem. Attached is the patch. --

libreoffice, Makefile fix proposal...

2012-06-06 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
Well, now that libreoffice build is solved, than what about insert a line: CONFLICTS_BUILD=boost* near line 63 of Makefile??? this will prevent libreoffice build with boost in the system. Sergio ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: libreoffice, Makefile fix proposal...

2012-06-06 Thread Heino Tiedemann
Sergio de Almeida Lenzi lenzi.ser...@gmail.com wrote: Well, now that libreoffice build is solved, than what about insert a line: CONFLICTS_BUILD=boost* near line 63 of Makefile??? this will prevent libreoffice build with boost in the system. Does that mean, that libreoffice won't

Re: libreoffice, Makefile fix proposal...

2012-06-06 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.de wrote: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi lenzi.ser...@gmail.com wrote: Well, now that libreoffice build is solved, than  what about insert a line: CONFLICTS_BUILD=    boost* near line 63 of Makefile??? this will prevent

Re: libreoffice, Makefile fix proposal...

2012-06-06 Thread Kevin Oberman
Yes, boost is used by many things, but a CONFLICTS line is appropriate as libreoffice will not build correctly if it is installed. In addition, we need instructions to temporarily remove boost-libs and boost-jam while libreoffice is building. It may then be re-installed, as boost is only a