+-Le 21/07/07 18:53 -0300, Marc G. Fournier a dit :
|
| Running latest -STABLE of FreeBSD on an 64bit Dual Core, mulberry mail
| seems to run okay until such a point in time as I try to PGP Sign/Encrypt
| an email and send it out, then it 'Seg Faults' ...
|
| gpg appears to run fine from the
Running latest -STABLE of FreeBSD on an 64bit Dual Core, mulberry mail seems to
run okay until such a point in time as I try to PGP Sign/Encrypt an email and
send it out, then it 'Seg Faults' ...
gpg appears to run fine from the command line, using gpg --list-keys ...
Anyone running
--On July 21, 2007 6:53:23 PM -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Running latest -STABLE of FreeBSD on an 64bit Dual Core, mulberry mail
seems to run okay until such a point in time as I try to PGP
Sign/Encrypt an email and send it out, then it 'Seg Faults' ...
gpg appears to run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Saturday, July 21, 2007 17:13:51 -0500 Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--On July 21, 2007 6:53:23 PM -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Running latest -STABLE of FreeBSD on an 64bit Dual Core, mulberry mail
seems to
--On July 21, 2007 9:10:27 PM -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Which list? :( I'm on mulberry-discuss ...
Oh, sorry. The mulberry-devel list.
Hopefully now that he's puttin gout the source code, we can get a
FreeBSD Native version in ports ... :)
Hopefully.
The funny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Saturday, July 21, 2007 22:58:40 -0500 Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Including GPG?
Yes, been using Mulberry for months now *because* of the GPG support, actually
... it was what finally get me off of Pine ... but, again, only
