If GNOMEVFS2 option is selected in sysutils/ntfsprogs, then make-ing of any
target
becomes impossible:
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 657: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk
part
is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOME=yes before bsd.port.pre.mk?
--
Andriy Gapon
Hi!
If GNOMEVFS2 option is selected in sysutils/ntfsprogs, then make-ing of any
target
becomes impossible:
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 657: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk
part
is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOME=yes before bsd.port.pre.mk?
See
http
On 10/8/2012 8:30 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
If GNOMEVFS2 option is selected in sysutils/ntfsprogs, then make-ing of any
target
becomes impossible:
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 657: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk
part
is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOME=yes before
Submitter-Id: current-users
Originator:Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com
Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Linux Unix Consultancy, Munich/Muenchen.
Confidential: no
Synopsis: Add CONFLICTS_INSTALL=fusefs-ntfs to sysutils/ntfsprogs/Makefile
Severity: non-critical
Priority: low
, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Jan Henrik Sylvester m...@janh.de wrote:
As you are working on ntfsprogs, are you able to use ntfsresize at all?
For me, ntfsresize never worked in ntfsprogs-2.0.0, but it did in
ntfsprogs-1.13.1. We had a discussion about ntfsprogs on freebsd-questions
almost a year
Hi.
I made two patches for ntfsprogs.
(and btw, I don't know: who's the port mainter? who should I give these
patches?)
The first one, in libntfs/device.c, adding the correct defines, to get the
device geometry.
The second one, in ntfsprogs/mkntfs.c, managing character (previously
block)devices
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:54:14 +0100
Samuel Mart__n Moro faus...@gmail.com wrote:
I made two patches for ntfsprogs.
(and btw, I don't know: who's the port mainter? who should I give these
patches?)
There isn't a maintainer. The best thing is to file a PR with your
patches attached so
done
thanks
Samuel Martín Moro
{EPITECH.} tek4
CamTrace S.A.S
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Gary Jennejohn
gary.jennej...@freenet.dewrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:54:14 +0100
Samuel Mart__n Moro faus...@gmail.com wrote:
I made two patches for ntfsprogs.
(and btw, I don't know: who's
As you are working on ntfsprogs, are you able to use ntfsresize at all?
For me, ntfsresize never worked in ntfsprogs-2.0.0, but it did in
ntfsprogs-1.13.1. We had a discussion about ntfsprogs on
freebsd-questions almost a year ago:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009
CamTrace S.A.S
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Jan Henrik Sylvester m...@janh.de wrote:
As you are working on ntfsprogs, are you able to use ntfsresize at all?
For me, ntfsresize never worked in ntfsprogs-2.0.0, but it did in
ntfsprogs-1.13.1. We had a discussion about ntfsprogs on freebsd-questions
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:05:45 +0200
Jan Henrik Sylvester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a particular reason our ntfsprogs port did not get updated for
a year but now it has?
None I'm aware of, I just received a request and did it one day, as it
was very similar to the fusefs-ntfs port
Is there a particular reason our ntfsprogs port did not get updated for
a year but now it has?
So far I did use ntfs-3g for mounting and ntfsprogs for resizing etc.
with very few problems. Once on copying many files, two of them were
only partially written with error messages Bad address
12 matches
Mail list logo
