Thank you very much!
From: Fernando Apesteguía
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2020 1:55:03 PM
To: Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
Cc: FreeBSD Ports
Subject: Re: math/octave-forge-audio port
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:57 PM Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
wrote:
>
>
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:57 PM Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
wrote:
>
> I am the maintainer of the math/octave-forge-audio port. I am getting
> multiple reports of build errors from pkg-fallout@. But I am unable to
> reproduce these errors. Configure claims it cannot find RTMIDI. B
I am the maintainer of the math/octave-forge-audio port. I am getting
multiple reports of build errors from pkg-fallout@. But I am unable to
reproduce these errors. Configure claims it cannot find RTMIDI. But it
does preinstall the audio/rtmidi port from packages before it tries to
build
I am trying to make the port math/octave-forge-miscellaneous clang
compliant. In the file ${WRKSRC}/partarray.cc is are lines like this:
Arrayoctave_idx_type bidc [maxdims], eidc [maxdims];
... stuff ...
eidc[i] = eidx;
The compilation dies saying that eidc is not defined. If I
On 05/17/2014 12:00 PM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
I am trying to make the port math/octave-forge-miscellaneous clang
compliant. In the file ${WRKSRC}/partarray.cc is are lines like this:
Arrayoctave_idx_type bidc [maxdims], eidc [maxdims];
... stuff ...
eidc[i] = eidx
On Sat, 17 May 2014 17:13:51 + Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
On 05/17/2014 12:00 PM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
I am trying to make the port math/octave-forge-miscellaneous clang
compliant. In the file ${WRKSRC}/partarray.cc is are lines like this:
Arrayoctave_idx_type bidc
On 05/17/2014 12:40 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014 17:13:51 + Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
On 05/17/2014 12:00 PM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
I am trying to make the port math/octave-forge-miscellaneous clang
compliant. In the file ${WRKSRC}/partarray.cc
Hi Stephen, and ports@
I would like to ask you the final check of our patch against
octave and octave-forge-* port. I also e-mail to port@ since
it is a sweeping commit.
Now ports tree has been unfrozen.
Octave 3.6.1 is out and I would like to update with attached patch.
Since this is an API
On 04/10/2012 08:51 PM, Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi Stephen, and ports@
I would like to ask you the final check of our patch against
octave and octave-forge-* port. I also e-mail to port@ since
it is a sweeping commit.
Now ports tree has been unfrozen.
Octave 3.6.1 is out and I would like to update
Hi Stephen,
Done from my side, now it's your turn!
Best
Nakata Maho
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu
Subject: Re: octave port will be updated to 3.6.1 and all the octave-forge
ports will be updated accordingly.
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:31:28 -0500
On 04/10/2012 08:51 PM
I'm now done as well.
On 04/10/2012 10:05 PM, Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Done from my side, now it's your turn!
Best
Nakata Maho
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smithstep...@missouri.edu
Subject: Re: octave port will be updated to 3.6.1 and all the octave-forge
ports will be updated
I am the maintainer of the octave-forge ports. If you can send me some
diagnostics, I will be happy to work on this problem.
Hi Stephen,
I am not sure what you would like exactly for diagnostics, but if you
do what I said in my email, you should see cartprod and textread
disappear as you
I am not sure what you would like exactly for diagnostics, but if you
do what I said in my email, you should see cartprod and textread
disappear as you install io and linear-algebra respectively.
Sorry disappear == not visible from the octave prompt and not
findable in the filesystem.
I asked this at the octave maintainers list, thought I would bounce it here too.
-- Forwarded message --
From: forkandwait forkandw...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:23 PM
Subject: Problems with freebsd octave-forge ports?
To: maintain...@octave.org
I will ask
Hi,
I am the maintainer of the octave-forge ports. If you can send me some
diagnostics, I will be happy to work on this problem.
Stephen
FW wrote:
I asked this at the octave maintainers list, thought I would bounce it here too.
-- Forwarded message --
From
I was wondering if someone could look at ports/139342?
It is a very simple pair of fixes, so that the octave-forge-* ports will
become functional again.
Stephen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
I am the octave-forge maintainer.
The octave forge source files have been updated. Quite a few of the new
source packages require octave-devel (3.1.55) instead of octave itself.
I am not quite sure what to do. I was hoping some end users could
give me their opinion. Here are some options
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu
Subject: octave forge update issues
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 17:40:18 -0500
I am the octave-forge maintainer.
The octave forge source files have been updated. Quite a few of the
new source packages require octave-devel (3.1.55) instead
Hi Guys,
I have this problem in that if the octave-forge-ann port is installed,
then when I exit octave, octave crashes. This is a problem with
FreeBSD-CURRENT on an amd64 machine, but not on FreeBSD-STABLE on i386
machines.
First, I am asking for me-too reports, so that I can get some
it requires a newer
version of netcdf than FreeBSD currently has in the ports.
Hi Stephen,
Thank you for your efforts to port octave-forge to FreeBSD!
I'm the author of octcdf. Which version of netcdf is included in ports?
From a quick google search I found this page
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi
efforts to port octave-forge to FreeBSD!
I'm the author of octcdf. Which version of netcdf is included in ports?
From a quick google search I found this page
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=netcdf and it looks like
that 3.6.3 included. In principle, octcdf should build with any
version
,
Thank you for your efforts to port octave-forge to FreeBSD!
I'm the author of octcdf. Which version of netcdf is included in ports?
From a quick google search I found this page
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=netcdf and it looks like
that 3.6.3 included. In principle, octcdf should
I have now created a working octave-forge port for FreeBSD. You can
find it at
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen/octave-forge/
Please use the latest version.
To make it:
cd /usr/ports
tar xvfz oct-fg-port-0.4.tar.gz
cd math/octave-forge
make install clean
To delete it:
pkg_delete -r
Dear All,
I am attempting to make a new math/octave-forge port. I would like to
offer this proof of concept, so as to get advice before finishing it
off. It is at
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen/octave-forge/octave-forge-port-bundle.tar.gz.
It is implemented as a metaport. So far I
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:29:48PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Dear Maho,
I see that octave-forge has been broken for quite a while. Do you mind if
I have a go at redoing it?
I presume that you would want to do it meta-port style, that is, lots of
ports with names like
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:29:48PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Dear Maho,
I see that octave-forge has been broken for quite a while. Do you mind if
I have a go at redoing it?
I presume that you would want to do it meta-port style, that is, lots of
ports
08/08/24 (日曜日) 01：27AM、 Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]のメッセージ：
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:29:48PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Dear Maho,
I see that octave-forge has been broken for quite a while. Do you mind if
I have a go at redoing it?
I presume that you would want to do
Dear Maho,
I see that octave-forge has been broken for quite a while. Do you mind
if I have a go at redoing it?
I presume that you would want to do it meta-port style, that is, lots of
ports with names like octave-forge-plot-1.0.5.
I would be happy to do the work, and I think I could get
Nakata 真秀 wrote:
Do you need to be the MAINTAINER?
Thank you,
OK, make me the maintainer.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for your e-mail.
Dear Maho,
I see that octave-forge has been broken for quite a while. Do you mind
if I have a go at redoing it?
Yes - it's been broken. octave-forge has been changed drastically, and
I'm not sure what to do. Therefore I'm really appreciated if you take
From: Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: octave-forge on FreeBSD 7.0
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:59:56 -0600
I'd rather see USE_GCC set unconditionally, so that INDEX will
be the same on 6 and 7.
Me too.
Is there any hope of the software being updated? My concern is
that once we set
IMHO, octave-forge should be merged into octave itself,
and relese version of octave and corrsponding octave-forge is old.
I think this is a temporal situation. Once octave will be updated
octave-forge will also be updated, and I believe octave-forge
will be built with gcc42.
OK
On Sunday 18 November 2007, Maho NAKATA wrote:
How about doing something more simple like:
.if ${OSVERSION} = 700042
USE_GCC=3.4
.endif
which works great in my situation.
I'd rather see USE_GCC set unconditionally, so that INDEX will
be the same on 6 and 7.
Is there any hope of
===
RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.19 Makefile
--- Makefile1 Oct 2007 09:34:23 - 1.19
+++ Makefile19 Nov 2007 04:22:31 -
@@ -36,9 +36,7 @@
.include bsd.port.pre.mk
Dear Maho,
I noticed that you added lines like:
.if ${OSVERSION} = 700042
.if ${ARCH} == amd64 || ${ARCH} == sparc64
BROKEN= Does not compile with GCC 4.2
.endif
.endif
to the Makefile of math/octave-forge. But it also doesn't build on my
i386 FreeBSD 7.0 machine.
How about doing
/octave-forge/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.19 Makefile
--- Makefile1 Oct 2007 09:34:23 - 1.19
+++ Makefile19 Nov 2007 04:22:31 -
@@ -36,9 +36,7 @@
.include bsd.port.pre.mk
.if ${OSVERSION} = 700042
-.if ${ARCH} == amd64 || ${ARCH} == sparc64
-BROKEN
36 matches
Mail list logo
