On Mon, 8 May 2017 19:24:10 +0100
RW via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > Samba + GVFS + Thunar doesn't make your FreeBSD filesystems
> > available from Windows machines. It makes your Windows file shares
> > available on FreeBSD, and they show up in Thunar just like other
>
On Mon, 8 May 2017 09:29:47 -0700
Freddie Cash wrote:
> Samba + GVFS + Thunar doesn't make your FreeBSD filesystems
> available from Windows machines. It makes your Windows file shares
> available on FreeBSD, and they show up in Thunar just like other
> folders. GVFS uses libsmbclient and/or
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 4:14 AM, wrote:
> [Default] On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:11:00 +0200, Sebastian Schwarz
> wrote:
>
> >On 2017-05-04, scratch65...@att.net wrote:
> >> I can't imagine what code could possibly be in thunar and
> >> samba that the xfce
[Default] On Thu, 4 May 2017 14:18:46 +0100, RW via freebsd-ports
wrote:
>AFAIK samba isn't a dependency of XFCE. I don't have it and it's not in
>the output of make all-depends-list.
Thanks, you beat me to it. I thought such a dependency would be
pretty
[Default] On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:11:00 +0200, Sebastian Schwarz
wrote:
>On 2017-05-04, scratch65...@att.net wrote:
>> I can't imagine what code could possibly be in thunar and
>> samba that the xfce desktop would need, (...)
>
>Thunar is used to display the icons on the XFCE
On 7/5/17 5:14 am, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Sebastian Schwarz
wrote:
On 2017-05-04, scratch65...@att.net wrote:
I can't imagine what code could possibly be in thunar and
samba that the xfce desktop would need, (...)
Thunar is used to display
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Sebastian Schwarz
wrote:
> On 2017-05-04, scratch65...@att.net wrote:
> > I can't imagine what code could possibly be in thunar and
> > samba that the xfce desktop would need, (...)
>
> Thunar is used to display the icons on the XFCE desktop.
On 2017-05-04, scratch65...@att.net wrote:
> I can't imagine what code could possibly be in thunar and
> samba that the xfce desktop would need, (...)
Thunar is used to display the icons on the XFCE desktop. It
depends on gvfs, which is used for accessing remote file systems
and the trash inside
On Thu, 04 May 2017 07:43:30 -0600
Jim Trigg wrote:
> ISTR that it's Thunar that depends on Samba by default.
Yes it looks like it came in when Thunar defaulted to depending on the
"Trash Panel Applet Plugin". Unfortunately the options framework
caches old defaults.
ISTR that it's Thunar that depends on Samba by default.
Jim
On May 4, 2017 7:18:46 AM MDT, RW via freebsd-ports
wrote:
>On Thu, 04 May 2017 08:09:47 -0400
>scratch65...@att.net wrote:
>>
>> I can't imagine what code could possibly be in thunar and samba
>> that the
On Thu, 04 May 2017 08:09:47 -0400
scratch65...@att.net wrote:
>
> I can't imagine what code could possibly be in thunar and samba
> that the xfce desktop would need, particularly since the desktop
> is very simple, and also because I've never got samba
> functionality for free after installing
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 08:09:47AM -0400, scratch65...@att.net wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2017 16:53:41 +0100, Matthew Seaman
> wrote:
>
> >>> Trying to install the desktop package, I discovered that it's
> >>> bundled with at least 2 unrelated pieces of software:
On Wed, 3 May 2017 16:53:41 +0100, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
>>> Trying to install the desktop package, I discovered that it's
>>> bundled with at least 2 unrelated pieces of software: Thunar,
>>> and samba44. That bothered me, but I needed the desktop.
>
On 2017/05/03 15:53, Chris H wrote:
> On Wed, 03 May 2017 08:03:36 -0400 wrote
>
>> After doing a general pkg upgrade on my server-of-all-work, I
>> discovered after some research that the Big Grey Background I was
>> left with was due to pkg having deleted, but not
On Wed, 03 May 2017 08:03:36 -0400 wrote
> After doing a general pkg upgrade on my server-of-all-work, I
> discovered after some research that the Big Grey Background I was
> left with was due to pkg having deleted, but not replaced, xfce4
> desktop.
>
> Trying to install
After doing a general pkg upgrade on my server-of-all-work, I
discovered after some research that the Big Grey Background I was
left with was due to pkg having deleted, but not replaced, xfce4
desktop.
Trying to install the desktop package, I discovered that it's
bundled with at least 2
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 18:55:06 +0200
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 07:00:01AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Is it possible and doable via a simple setup (script/environment) to fetch
> > pre-built packages for 10.2-STABLE/10.2-RELEASE with pkg/pkgng on
> >
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 07:00:01AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Is it possible and doable via a simple setup (script/environment) to fetch
> pre-built packages for 10.2-STABLE/10.2-RELEASE with pkg/pkgng on 11-CURRENT?
>
> Background: running a development system on 11-CURRENT, on which I prefer
Is it possible and doable via a simple setup (script/environment) to fetch
pre-built packages for 10.2-STABLE/10.2-RELEASE with pkg/pkgng on 11-CURRENT?
Background: running a development system on 11-CURRENT, on which I prefer to
build my packages in the traditional way from sources without that
install -y www/mod_wsgi3 www/apache22
Updating repository catalogue
pkg: No packages matching 'www/apache22' available in the repositories
$ sudo pkg install -y www/apache22 www/mod_wsgi3
Updating repository catalogue
apache22-2.2.26 already installed
The following 1 packages will be installed
20 matches
Mail list logo