-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug Barton wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
Just before sending my mail, I took a look at the cvs log, last entry is from
more than 6 months ago, unless something is somehow fubared with my archive.
If
it sits unchanged for so long, I interpreted
On March 10, 2009 10:05 am Chuck Robey wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
Just before sending my mail, I took a look at the cvs log, last entry
is from more than 6 months ago, unless something is somehow fubared
with my archive. If it sits unchanged for so long, I interpreted
Chuck Robey wrote:
Doug, we were speaking of portmanager, not portmaster
I realize that. I was simply attempting to support Robert's point. I
could have used several other mature ports that I maintain as
examples but I thought I'd try to stay as close to on topic as
possible.
My apologies if
I think this was probably intended for the list rather than me:
On Mar 8, 4:04 pm, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
Here's the portmanager listing, maybe someone here can tell me
what's causing portmanager to
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 14:38 +, RW wrote:
I think this was probably intended for the list rather than me:
On Mar 8, 4:04 pm, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
Here's the portmanager listing, maybe someone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
RW wrote:
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
Here's the portmanager listing, maybe someone here can tell me what's
causing portmanager to want to patch my bsd.port.mk, and why the
patchfile should be so far
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 21:00 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
RW wrote:
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
Here's the portmanager listing, maybe someone here can tell me what's
causing portmanager to want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Noland wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 21:00 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
RW wrote:
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
Here's the portmanager listing, maybe someone here can tell me what's
causing
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 22:24 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Noland wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 21:00 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
RW wrote:
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
Here's the portmanager
Chuck Robey wrote:
Just before sending my mail, I took a look at the cvs log, last entry is from
more than 6 months ago, unless something is somehow fubared with my archive.
If
it sits unchanged for so long, I interpreted that as being dead, I wasn't
trying
to be insulting, maybe I made
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm busy trying to use portmanager to get me to kde4.2, but I'm having problem
in updating my misc/localedata port. Portmanager has decided misc/localedata
needs to get rebuilt, and for some reason, that it needs to patch my
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port/mk
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 14:40 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm busy trying to use portmanager to get me to kde4.2, but I'm having problem
in updating my misc/localedata port. Portmanager has decided misc/localedata
needs to get rebuilt, and for some
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:40:08 -0400
Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
Here's the portmanager listing, maybe someone here can tell me what's
causing portmanager to want to patch my bsd.port.mk, and why the
patchfile should be so far off, and what might be the CORRECT way to
fix this. Oh,
13 matches
Mail list logo
