On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:07:52 -0500
Philip M. Gollucci pgollu...@p6m7g8.com wrote:
On 1/23/2011 10:32 PM, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
Hi,
Before I committed this update, I have tested lsof 4.85A on 8.1 and
it does work fine.
I don't think it is reasonable to remove the patch and
Hi,
Before I committed this update, I have tested lsof 4.85A on 8.1 and it
does work fine.
I don't think it is reasonable to remove the patch and prevent 8.1
users from using lsof.
At least, tinderbox running 8.1 requires lsof to work.
hih
Regards,
sunpoet
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Larry
On 1/23/2011 10:32 PM, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
Hi,
Before I committed this update, I have tested lsof 4.85A on 8.1 and it
does work fine.
I don't think it is reasonable to remove the patch and prevent 8.1
users from using lsof.
At least, tinderbox running 8.1 requires lsof to work.
PLEASE revert the configure patch. It is NOT supported by the upstream
author, intentionally as he's never run the test suite against 8.1.
On Sat, January 22, 2011 2:46 pm, sunp...@freebsd.org wrote:
Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] sysutils/lsof: update to 4.85A
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
