Re: ports head -r484652: lang/ruby24 fails to amd64 -> armv7 cross build: qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (2 of them) [armv7 native build worked]

2018-11-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
Top post about bad comparison: The comparison to x11/pixman turns out to be a misnomer. More testing by Jan B. showed that -O2 vs -O was not sufficient to control the behavior for x11/pixman's builds. pixman's issue traces back to use of .object_arch armv4 in four .S files and them causing

Re: ports head -r484652: lang/ruby24 fails to amd64 -> armv7 cross build: qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (2 of them) [armv7 native build worked]

2018-11-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
[While the poudriere-devel/qemu-arm-static/nxb-bin/ amd64 -> armv7 cross build failed, a native armv7 build worked. It turns out the difference that matters is likely -O2 use vs -O use. More later below.] On 2018-Nov-10, at 23:29, Mark Millard wrote: > Poudriere-devel reported: > > [00:18:32]