On 2013/02/16 15:46, Mikhail T. wrote:
> 15.02.2013 23:21, Ian Lepore ???(??):
>> Since /home/ian/foo/BSDmakefile is not building something that is part
>> of the freebsd world, or the freebsd kernel, then according to that
>> paragraph, a build using that makefile should not be affected
>> by
On 2013/02/15 05:57, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am 02/14/13 14:19, schrieb Yamaya Takashi:
>> On 2013/02/13 22:33, Tom Evans wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi
>>> wrote:
On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/s
15.02.2013 23:21, Ian Lepore ???(??):
> Since /home/ian/foo/BSDmakefile is not building something that is part
> of the freebsd world, or the freebsd kernel, then according to that
> paragraph, a build using that makefile should not be affected
> by /etc/src.conf.
Maybe it should not be affect
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 23:09 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
> 15.02.2013 19:12, Ian Lepore ???(??):
> > The src.conf manpage is not in error. The intent is that src.conf
> > applies only to the building of the freebsd world and kernel, that is,
> > the source that's usually located under /usr/src. I
15.02.2013 19:12, Ian Lepore ???(??):
> The src.conf manpage is not in error. The intent is that src.conf
> applies only to the building of the freebsd world and kernel, that is,
> the source that's usually located under /usr/src. If settings from
> src.conf are leaking into other builds, the
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 17:32 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
> 14.02.2013 09:34, Peter Pentchev ???(??):
> > However, there is then the argument of "well, if you want to use the
> > bsd.*.mk
> > infrastructure, then why don't you just copy it into your project and
> > include
> > it from there - ju
Peter Pentchev wrote this message on Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 16:34 +0200:
> There are some people - and some of them are well-respected long-term
> Free-and-other-BSD developers - who are of the opinion that the
> /usr/share/mk/bsd.*.mk infrastructure is meant for the base system build
> only. I do i
14.02.2013 09:34, Peter Pentchev ???(??):
However, there is then the argument of "well, if you want to use the bsd.*.mk
infrastructure, then why don't you just copy it into your project and include
it from there - just like many, many projects do with, say, the sys/queue.h
header, or parts
Am 02/14/13 14:19, schrieb Yamaya Takashi:
> On 2013/02/13 22:33, Tom Evans wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi
>> wrote:
>>> On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
instance
#
CXX
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 01:55:58PM +, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Mikhail T. wrote:
> > I may sound defensive here, but I'll still repeat, that "this singular port"
> > (and I do, in fact, have other ones like it) started using bsd.lib.mk 5
> > years before src.conf (an
14.02.2013 08:55, Tom Evans написав(ла):
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Mikhail T. wrote:
>> > I may sound defensive here, but I'll still repeat, that "this singular
>> > port"
>> > (and I do, in fact, have other ones like it) started using bsd.lib.mk 5
>> > years before src.conf (and its man
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Mikhail T. wrote:
> I may sound defensive here, but I'll still repeat, that "this singular port"
> (and I do, in fact, have other ones like it) started using bsd.lib.mk 5
> years before src.conf (and its man-page) was added to the tree.
>
> -mi
This is true. But w
On 2013/02/13 22:33, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi
> wrote:
>> On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
>>> instance
>>>
>>> #
>>> CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++
>>> CXXFLAGS+=
14.02.2013 08:02, Tom Evans написав(ла):
> I think src.conf is meant only to be included when building src. For
> example, bsd.port.mk sets _WITHOUT_SRCCONF before including bsd.own.mk
> (which is the makefile that includes src.conf). It's done this since
> src.conf was added in 2006, so evidently
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Mikhail T. wrote:
> 13.02.2013 11:22, O. Hartmann написав(ла):
>>> > If this is taken literally then could it be said that ports that use
>>> > bsd.lib.mk are broken because they are using makefile includes from
>>> > the source tree?
>>> >
>>> > -Kimmo
> For one,
13.02.2013 11:22, O. Hartmann написав(ла):
>> > If this is taken literally then could it be said that ports that use
>> > bsd.lib.mk are broken because they are using makefile includes from
>> > the source tree?
>> >
>> > -Kimmo
For one, the particular port (its Makefile.bsd) was created in 2001,
Am 02/13/13 15:05, schrieb Kimmo Paasiala:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi
>> wrote:
>>> On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
instance
>>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi
> wrote:
>> On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
>>> instance
>>>
>>> #
>>> CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++
>>>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Yamaya Takashi
wrote:
> On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
>> instance
>>
>> #
>> CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++
>> CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++11
>>
>>
>> which do NOT appea
On 2013/02/13 19:08, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
> instance
>
> #
> CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++
> CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++11
>
>
> which do NOT appear in /etc/make.conf, make building port
> grahpics/libfpx complainin
Setting only base system source compiler optins in /etc/src.conf, for
instance
#
CXXFLAGS+= -stdlib=libc++
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++11
which do NOT appear in /etc/make.conf, make building port
grahpics/libfpx complaining about unrecognized compiler options.
As far a sI know,
21 matches
Mail list logo
