OK. I've just committed a patch.
Sandra Kachelmann wrote:
Hi
I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please re-implement it?
Sandra
Sergey Matveychuk s...@freebsd.org
Date
3 Jul 2008 09:50:58
Subject
Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'' does not show current version
Robert Huff wrote:
Sandra Kachelmann writes:
I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please
re-implement it?
Try the -F switch.
(I believe this used to be the default, but Something Happened(tm)
within the last year to make it necessary to use it explicitly.
On Thursday 09 April 2009 23:22:17 Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
OK. I've just committed a patch.
[...SKIP...]
Sem, what about to restore old functionality with repacking dependent packages
by
portupgrade -rp ?
With last versions of portupgrade it works only for bumped/rebuilded packages,
but not
Hi
I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please re-implement it?
Sandra
Sergey Matveychuk s...@freebsd.org
Date
3 Jul 2008 09:50:58
Subject
Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'' does not show current version
Message-ID
486ca0af.3020...@freebsd.org
In reply to
Sandra
Sandra Kachelmann writes:
I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please
re-implement it?
Try the -F switch.
(I believe this used to be the default, but Something Happened(tm)
within the last year to make it necessary to use it explicitly.
There was a message
After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command
$ portversion -vl''
does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I
found the information useful.
before:
gnutls-2.4.0 needs updating (port has 2.4.1)
now:
gnutlsneeds
Sandra Kachelmann wrote:
After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command
$ portversion -vl''
does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I
found the information useful.
before:
gnutls-2.4.0 needs updating (port has 2.4.1)
now:
gnutls
