Re: print/cups overhaul (PR 207746) side-effects

2016-03-15 Thread Jim Ohlstein
Hello, > On Mar 15, 2016, at 2:44 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Walter Schwarzenfeld > wrote: >> Where is the problem? There is only one "big" port (llvm36). Will be >> sstimate 1 !/2 hours. Poudriere and more

Re: print/cups overhaul (PR 207746) side-effects

2016-03-15 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > Where is the problem? There is only one "big" port (llvm36). Will be > sstimate 1 !/2 hours. Poudriere and more synth often wants more. > And how many hours will it take to compile the llvm port on a

Re: print/cups overhaul (PR 207746) side-effects

2016-03-15 Thread Martin Waschbüsch
> Am 12.03.2016 um 16:51 schrieb Walter Schwarzenfeld > : > > Where is the problem? There is only one "big" port (llvm36). Will be sstimate > 1 !/2 hours. Poudriere and more synth often wants more. Re-reading the messages, I realize that I blew this out of

Re: print/cups overhaul (PR 207746) side-effects

2016-03-14 Thread Walter Schwarzenfeld
Where is the problem? There is only one "big" port (llvm36). Will be sstimate 1 !/2 hours. Poudriere and more synth often wants more. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe,

Re: print/cups overhaul (PR 207746) side-effects

2016-03-12 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 16:41:47 +0100 Martin Waschbüsch wrote: > Am 12.03.2016 um 14:10 schrieb Tijl Coosemans : >> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:52:08 +0100 Martin Waschbüsch >> wrote: >>> I just did a rebuild of packages for my

Re: print/cups overhaul (PR 207746) side-effects

2016-03-12 Thread Martin Waschbüsch
> Am 12.03.2016 um 14:10 schrieb Tijl Coosemans : > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:52:08 +0100 Martin Waschbüsch > wrote: >> I just did a rebuild of packages for my webservers with poudriere. >> What I noticed was that via the print/cups overhaul (see PR

Re: print/cups overhaul (PR 207746) side-effects

2016-03-12 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:52:08 +0100 Martin Waschbüsch wrote: > I just did a rebuild of packages for my webservers with poudriere. > What I noticed was that via the print/cups overhaul (see PR 207746), > quite a lot (>50) of additional dependencies are added to the system, >

Re: print/cups overhaul (PR 207746) side-effects

2016-03-12 Thread Martin Waschbüsch
> Am 11.03.2016 um 21:10 schrieb Jim Ohlstein : > > Hello, > > > > Jim Ohlstein >> On Mar 11, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Martin Waschbüsch wrote: >> If I wanted to adjust an existing port to be less greedy with regards to >> dependencies, >> how would I go

Re: print/cups overhaul (PR 207746) side-effects

2016-03-11 Thread Jim Ohlstein
Hello, Jim Ohlstein > On Mar 11, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Martin Waschbüsch wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just did a rebuild of packages for my webservers with poudriere. > What I noticed was that via the print/cups overhaul (see PR 207746), > quite a lot (>50) of additional

print/cups overhaul (PR 207746) side-effects

2016-03-11 Thread Martin Waschbüsch
Hi all, I just did a rebuild of packages for my webservers with poudriere. What I noticed was that via the print/cups overhaul (see PR 207746), quite a lot (>50) of additional dependencies are added to the system, including lots of x11 related libs, avahi, dbus, cairo, opengl, etc. This stems