Rong-En Fan píše v út 06. 01. 2009 v 09:30 +0800:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 05:52:07PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Hi,
is my impression correct that this port (audio/aureal-kmod) never made
it past 5-CURRENT? Seems the stray code check will fire on 6-STABLE
and newer.
I seem to recall
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:26:53AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Rong-En Fan píše v út 06. 01. 2009 v 09:30 +0800:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 05:52:07PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Hi,
is my impression correct that this port (audio/aureal-kmod) never made
it past 5-CURRENT? Seems the
Rong-En Fan skrev:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:26:53AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Rong-En Fan píše v út 06. 01. 2009 v 09:30 +0800:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 05:52:07PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Hi,
is my impression correct that this port (audio/aureal-kmod) never made
it past 5-CURRENT?
Hi,
is my impression correct that this port (audio/aureal-kmod) never made
it past 5-CURRENT? Seems the stray code check will fire on 6-STABLE
and newer.
--
Pav Lucistnik p...@oook.cz
p...@freebsd.org
It whines, glows and fades...
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 05:52:07PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Hi,
is my impression correct that this port (audio/aureal-kmod) never made
it past 5-CURRENT? Seems the stray code check will fire on 6-STABLE
and newer.
I seem to recall when I commit the new rc script, I did a test on a
Rong-En Fan wrote:
is my impression correct that this port (audio/aureal-kmod) never made
it past 5-CURRENT? Seems the stray code check will fire on 6-STABLE
and newer.
I seem to recall when I commit the new rc script, I did a test on a
7-STABLE i386 box. Could you be more specific about which