Op 06-10-2011 21:39, Doug Barton schreef:
> On 10/06/2011 05:24, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> So, after the all discussions, security/cfs was silently removed.
>
I plead guilty.
> Right, because the EXPIRATION_DATE arrived and all the reasons for
> removing it were still valid.
&
On 10/06/2011 05:24, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> So, after the all discussions, security/cfs was silently removed.
Right, because the EXPIRATION_DATE arrived and all the reasons for
removing it were still valid.
I really don't need to explain to you that the files are still in the
attic,
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 03:24:39PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> So, after the all discussions, security/cfs was silently removed.
>
> I wrote several variants of the text to express my thought about this,
> but decided to only send this short notification instead.
Congratulations!
So, after the all discussions, security/cfs was silently removed.
I wrote several variants of the text to express my thought about this,
but decided to only send this short notification instead.
pgpZrVhqMLaNL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
nnect.
The second part makes sure that cfsd is killed on stop even if the
umount failed for some reason.
diff -ur /usr/ports/security/cfs/files/cfsd.sh.in cfs/files/cfsd.sh.in
--- /usr/ports/security/cfs/files/cfsd.sh.in2005-06-08 20:41:08.0
+0930
+++ cfs/files/cfsd.sh.in2010-
On Sep 17, 2008, at 7:52 PM, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:38:56PM -0400, Christopher Sean Hilton
wrote:
The port security/cfs, Matt Blaze's userland Cryptographic
filesystem,
is marked as broken because it does not compile under FreeBSD-7.0 or
later.
ports/1
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:38:56PM -0400, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
> The port security/cfs, Matt Blaze's userland Cryptographic filesystem,
> is marked as broken because it does not compile under FreeBSD-7.0 or
> later.
ports/127457
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:38:56PM -0400, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
> The port security/cfs, Matt Blaze's userland Cryptographic filesystem,
> is marked as broken because it does not compile under FreeBSD-7.0 or
> later.
I got patches which I (stupidely) never commited. I
The port security/cfs, Matt Blaze's userland Cryptographic filesystem,
is marked as broken because it does not compile under FreeBSD-7.0 or
later.
I've managed to get it to compile through some simple changes but I
don't know enough about RPC to know if I am on the r