On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:35:30AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 21/07/2010 23:05, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
And is this ok to have two ports with the same name.
No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some
On 21/07/2010 23:05, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
And is this ok to have two ports with the same name.
No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some
portupgrade tool will break.
No, they actually handle it ok. It _is_
Good day!
We now have two ports with name 'hydra' in the tree, one in security
category, and one in www.
Both installs file ${PREFIX}/bin/hydra.
I firstly think about asking for add CONFLICTS line, but then come up
to ports tree should not have
two ports with same name.
cvs-src writes:
Good day!
We now have two ports with name 'hydra' in the tree, one in security
category, and one in www.
Both installs file ${PREFIX}/bin/hydra.
I firstly think about asking for add CONFLICTS line, but then come up
to ports tree should not have
two
21.07.2010 20:47, Ashish SHUKLA пишет:
In case of multiple ports installing files with same name at same path, then
one of them needs to alter the file names by using suffix or prefix, like GNU
projects do when they collide with BSD equivalents by using 'g' as prefix.
I don't think that
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov writes:
21.07.2010 20:47, Ashish SHUKLA пишет:
In case of multiple ports installing files with same name at same path, then
one of them needs to alter the file names by using suffix or prefix, like GNU
projects do when they collide with BSD equivalents by using 'g' as
21.07.2010 20:47, Ashish SHUKLA ??:
In case of multiple ports installing files with same name at same path, then
one of them needs to alter the file names by using suffix or prefix, like
GNU
projects do when they collide with BSD equivalents by using 'g' as prefix.
I don't
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
And is this ok to have two ports with the same name.
No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some
portupgrade tool will break.
No, they actually handle it ok. It _is_ confusing to the users, however
(and, if you go
Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
And is this ok to have two ports with the same name.
No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some
portupgrade tool will break.
No, they actually handle it ok. It _is_
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
And is this ok to have two ports with the same name.
No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some
portupgrade tool will break.
No, they
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:18:36AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
Ah, it uses NO_LATEST_LINK. So the answer is `none'. Sorry.
Yeah, but I had to look it up myself.
Do you know of any other examples that are missing either CONFLICTS or
NO_LATEST_LINK?
mcl
Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com writes:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:18:36AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
Ah, it uses NO_LATEST_LINK. So the answer is `none'. Sorry.
Yeah, but I had to look it up myself.
Do you know of any other examples that are missing either CONFLICTS or
NO_LATEST_LINK?
12 matches
Mail list logo
