25.11.2018 18:57, Franco Fichtner wrote:
>> Why can't you use LibreSSL port for some ports and base libssl for other
>> ports?
>> That is, net/mpd5 links with base system libfetch that depends on base
>> libssl,
>> so it is example of port that cannot be built with LibreSSL.
>
> FWIW, since
I had this problem in the past, the solution I found was to build a
"port" of libfetch using /usr/src/lib/libfetch link libfetchagainst
security/openssl and than net/mpd5 against the libfetch in
/usr/local/lib
It was some time ago..
___
> On 25. Nov 2018, at 12:51 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> Why can't you use LibreSSL port for some ports and base libssl for other
> ports?
> That is, net/mpd5 links with base system libfetch that depends on base libssl,
> so it is example of port that cannot be built with LibreSSL.
FWIW,
25.11.2018 18:46, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> As maintainer of the net/mpd5 port, I wonder why our ports/Mk/Uses/ssl.mk
>> prevents building this port using FreeBSD 12 and base system libssl
>> when libressl is installed?
>>
>> While building with ssl=base, the port i
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 03:12:43PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As maintainer of the net/mpd5 port, I wonder why our ports/Mk/Uses/ssl.mk
> prevents building this port using FreeBSD 12 and base system libssl
> when libressl is installed?
>
> While building wi
Hi!
As maintainer of the net/mpd5 port, I wonder why our ports/Mk/Uses/ssl.mk
prevents building this port using FreeBSD 12 and base system libssl
when libressl is installed?
While building with ssl=base, the port itself does not include headers
from ${LOCALBASE}/include and it does not include
