staging mail/heirloom-mailx [for review]

2014-06-03 Thread Perry Hutchison
I noticed that mail/heirloom-mailx is no longer maintained, and has not been staged. It looks straightforward. Did I miss anything? --- Makefile2014-05-31 21:58:23.0 -0700 +++ Makefile-staged 2014-06-03 00:34:03.0 -0700 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ MASTER_SITES=

Re: staging mail/heirloom-mailx [for review]

2014-06-03 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Perry Hutchison per...@pluto.rain.com: I noticed that mail/heirloom-mailx is no longer maintained, and has not been staged. It looks straightforward. Did I miss anything? Yes, you missed something. mail/heirloom-mailx has been supsrseded by Steffen Daode Nurpmeso's S-nail. I haven't

Re: staging mail/heirloom-mailx [for review]

2014-06-03 Thread Christian Weisgerber
On 2014-06-03, Perry Hutchison per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: PLIST_FILES= bin/${PORTNAME} \ + man/man1/${PORTNAME}.1 \ @unexec if cmp -s %D/etc/nail.rc %D/etc/nail.rc.default; then ${RM} -f %D/etc/nail.rc; fi \ etc/nail.rc.default \

Re: staging mail/heirloom-mailx [for review]

2014-06-03 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 03.06.2014 17:09, schrieb Christian Weisgerber: On 2014-06-03, Perry Hutchison per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: PLIST_FILES=bin/${PORTNAME} \ +man/man1/${PORTNAME}.1 \ @unexec if cmp -s %D/etc/nail.rc %D/etc/nail.rc.default; then ${RM} -f %D/etc/nail.rc; fi

Re: staging mail/heirloom-mailx [for review]

2014-06-03 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Perry Hutchison per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: I noticed that mail/heirloom-mailx is no longer maintained, and has not been staged. It looks straightforward. Did I miss anything? --- Makefile2014-05-31 21:58:23.0 -0700 +++ Makefile-staged