On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:17:10PM +0200, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > I'd much rather see this used as something that reduced the amount of
> > code required for maintainers to build tarballs from SVN. ?For example
> > something similar in spirit to what I've done in devel/llvm-devel. ?That
> > means mi
> I'd much rather see this used as something that reduced the amount of
> code required for maintainers to build tarballs from SVN. For example
> something similar in spirit to what I've done in devel/llvm-devel. That
> means mirroring or otherwise transfering the source around is possible.
Would
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 08:23:02PM +0200, Eitan Adler wrote:
> I have a small patch to bsd.port.mk which would allow a port to
> replace its do-fetch with a svn export of a /specific revision/ of a
> remote repo.
>
> I know there have been some attempts at trying this before and from
> what I've b
I have a small patch to bsd.port.mk which would allow a port to
replace its do-fetch with a svn export of a /specific revision/ of a
remote repo.
I know there have been some attempts at trying this before and from
what I've been reading I addressed some of the major concerns:
1) Past attempts didn
